Compare StocksLULU vs NKE

lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) vs NIKE, Inc. (NKE)

LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$133.58
VS
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
$44.40

Rewards

LULU
  • lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • lululemon athletica inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
NKE
  • NIKE, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • NIKE, Inc. scores 72/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

LULU
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
NKE
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LULU
NKE
Valuation
$824.08M
Free Cash Flow
$3.27B
5.26%
FCF Yield
4.97%
10.07
Trailing P/E
29.21
10.08
Forward P/E
24.05
Quality & Moat
28.95%
ROIC
10.10%
31.83%
ROE
22.85%
56.60%
Gross Margin
40.92%
0.64
PEG Ratio
1.37
Balance Sheet Safety
0.36
Debt / Equity
0.79
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.00
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.81
N/A
Dividend Yield
3.69%
LULU: 9Ties: 1NKE: 1
LULUNKE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LULU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

NKE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LULU
$-10.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.94B
Δ Market Cap
$-49.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NKE
$-11.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.51B
Δ Market Cap
$-89.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LULU
53.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 53.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $133.58
Fair Value: $287.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NKE
61.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $44.40
Fair Value: $114.74
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LULU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $134?

-2.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies -2.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NKE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $44?

+8.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.4%

The market implies +8.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LULU
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NKE
72/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LULU
-1.92
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NKE
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LULU
Insiders 4.7%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 16.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,417
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NKE
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 82.2%Retail & Other 16.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,715
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LULU
2
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.49M
MAESTRINI ANDRE
Chief Executive Officer
$494,590
@ $151.02 · 2026-04-01
BERGH CHARLES V
Director
$999,978
@ $164.20 · 2026-03-20
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NKE
5
Buys (3M)
9
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.19M
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $42.27 · 2026-04-13
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $42.27 · 2026-04-13
COOK TIMOTHY D
Director
$1.06M
@ $42.43 · 2026-04-10
ROGERS JOHN W JR
Director
$173,360
@ $43.34 · 2026-04-09
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$500,002
@ $42.44 · 2026-04-07
HILL ELLIOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $61.10 · 2025-12-29
COOK TIMOTHY D
Director
$2.95M
@ $58.97 · 2025-12-22
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$500,080
@ $57.54 · 2025-12-22
KNUDSTORP JORGEN VIG
Director
$1.00M
@ $62.09 · 2025-11-07
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$502,756
@ $58.46 · 2025-04-04
ROGERS JOHN W JR
Director
$191,624
@ $76.65 · 2024-12-27
SWAN ROBERT HOLMES
Director
$226,516
@ $77.02 · 2024-06-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LULU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.90M
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$100,142
@ $161.00 · 2026-04-08
FRANK MEGHAN
Chief Financial Officer
$561,821
@ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$2.76M
@ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$109,470
@ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$6.38M
@ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$782,735
@ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$10.09M
@ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$131,021
@ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NKE
1
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $30.93M
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$565,021
@ $62.33 · 2026-02-12
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$5.58M
@ $64.80 · 2025-11-14
HEINLE TREASURE
Officer
$306,461
@ $71.27 · 2025-10-06
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$52,367
@ $75.13 · 2025-10-02
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$76,058
@ $74.64 · 2025-09-05
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$6.54M
@ $75.93 · 2025-08-14
MCCARTNEY PHILIP
Officer
$244,138
@ $77.21 · 2025-08-13
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$123,152
@ $74.91 · 2025-08-05
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$7.95M
@ $72.29 · 2025-07-16
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$9.49M
@ $62.05 · 2025-05-14
NIELSEN JOHANNA
Officer
$7,978
@ $57.81 · 2025-04-24
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$12.36M
@ $72.83 · 2025-02-14
LEINWAND ROBERT
Officer
$328,082
@ $72.81 · 2025-02-13
O NEILL HEIDI
Officer
$1.01M
@ $71.18 · 2025-02-11
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$3.46M
@ $76.64 · 2024-11-14
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$4.09M
@ $78.00 · 2024-08-14
FRIEND MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$394,281
@ $72.88 · 2024-08-07
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$8.03M
@ $72.97 · 2024-07-18
FRIEND MATTHEW
Chief Financial Officer
$889,185
@ $95.10 · 2024-06-05
PARKER MARK G
Officer and Director
$15.68M
@ $93.14 · 2024-05-14
NIELSEN JOHANNA
Officer
$26,406
@ $93.64 · 2024-05-09
MATHESON MONIQUE SUZETTE
Officer
$4.24M
@ $94.16 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LULU
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NKE
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LULU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
NKE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
View LULU Full AnalysisView NKE Full Analysis
LULU vs NKE: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io