Compare StocksLMT vs MCD

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs McDonald's Corporation (MCD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, LMT is overvalued at $541, with a DCF intrinsic value of $388 and a margin of safety of -39%. MCD is overvalued at $250, with an intrinsic value of $190 and a margin of safety of -32%. Of the two, MCD has the wider margin of safety.

LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$541.20
VS
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
$249.92

Rewards

LMT
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
MCD
  • McDonald's Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • McDonald's Corporation scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

LMT
  • Gross margin of 11.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $3.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
MCD
  • PEG ratio of 2.22 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 20 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LMT
MCD
Valuation
$5.56B
Free Cash Flow
$6.26B
4.45%
FCF Yield
3.54%
19.95
Trailing P/E
20.32
16.52
Forward P/E
17.88
Quality & Moat
24.82%
ROIC
18.63%
89.17%
ROE
N/A
11.80%
Gross Margin
57.38%
1.01
PEG Ratio
2.22
Balance Sheet Safety
1.91
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.60
2.57%
Dividend Yield
2.99%
LMT: 5Ties: 2MCD: 3
LMTMCD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LMT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MCD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LMT
$-1.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$8.03B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MCD
$2.28
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$10.74B
Δ Market Cap
+$24.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LMT
39.3% Overvalued
Price is 39.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $541.20
Fair Value: $388.39
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MCD
31.6% Overvalued
Price is 31.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $249.92
Fair Value: $189.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LMT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $541?

+12.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.0%

The market implies +12.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MCD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.0%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +16.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LMT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MCD
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LMT
-2.23
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MCD
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LMT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.7%Retail & Other 23.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,304
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MCD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 76.3%Retail & Other 23.4%
No. of Institutional Holders4,349
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LMT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MCD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LMT
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $13.88M
DONOVAN JOHN M
Director
$2.02M
@ $598.69 · 2026-08-13
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.57M
@ $600.76 · 2026-08-12
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
ULMER GREGORY M
Officer
$1.87M
@ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.59M
@ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
ST JOHN FRANK A
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.42M
@ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
Officer
$312,923
@ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$2.12M
@ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MCD
0
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.53M
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$1.49M
@ $284.32 · 2026-06-10
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$769,109
@ $278.36 · 2026-05-28
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$93,277
@ $280.11 · 2026-05-26
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$100,806
@ $302.72 · 2026-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$806,182
@ $307.00 · 2026-04-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$104,386
@ $313.47 · 2026-03-23
BARONI DARIO
Officer
$194,262
@ $323.77 · 2026-03-18
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$862,221
@ $328.34 · 2026-03-10
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.07M
@ $333.32 · 2026-02-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$110,033
@ $330.43 · 2026-02-23
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$17.47M
@ $332.44 · 2026-02-13
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.55M
@ $331.00 · 2026-02-12
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$854,106
@ $325.25 · 2026-02-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$805,079
@ $306.58 · 2026-01-12
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$795,520
@ $320.00 · 2025-12-16
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$207,270
@ $315.00 · 2025-12-12
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$2.01M
@ $305.50 · 2025-12-01
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$5.31M
@ $310.00 · 2025-11-21
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$977,095
@ $305.82 · 2025-11-14
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.95M
@ $300.42 · 2025-11-05
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$315,000
@ $315.00 · 2025-09-02
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.49M
@ $315.00 · 2025-08-20
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$310,000
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-19
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$770,970
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-06
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$296,216
@ $303.50 · 2025-08-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$281,221
@ $299.49 · 2025-07-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$300,000
@ $300.00 · 2025-07-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$270,920
@ $288.52 · 2025-06-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
President
$295,851
@ $315.07 · 2025-05-23
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$1.92M
@ $319.66 · 2025-05-20
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$299,072
@ $318.50 · 2025-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$287,616
@ $306.30 · 2025-03-24
BOYD TIFFANIE L
Officer
$309,270
@ $309.27 · 2025-02-27
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$286,395
@ $305.00 · 2025-02-24
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.23M
@ $308.71 · 2025-02-24
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$334,871
@ $304.71 · 2025-02-21
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$456,495
@ $304.33 · 2025-02-21
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$962,432
@ $300.76 · 2025-02-19
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.83M
@ $307.41 · 2025-02-13
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $310.05 · 2025-02-11
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$84,225
@ $280.75 · 2025-01-23
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$436,134
@ $290.95 · 2025-01-02
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$1.98M
@ $289.89 · 2024-12-31
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$319,919
@ $291.10 · 2024-12-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,458
@ $292.50 · 2024-11-25
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$441,470
@ $294.51 · 2024-11-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,326
@ $292.38 · 2024-10-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$727,260
@ $310.00 · 2024-10-14
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.83M
@ $305.00 · 2024-09-27
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.51M
@ $300.02 · 2024-09-24
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$328,128
@ $298.57 · 2024-09-23
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $300.04 · 2024-09-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LMT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MCD
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LMT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
MCD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View LMT Full AnalysisView MCD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LMT vs MCD

Is Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MCD trades at a -31.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $190 vs. price $250), compared to LMT's -39.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $388 vs. $541).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation?

MCD scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while LMT scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation?

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) generates a 4.5% free cash flow yield, compared to McDonald's Corporation's 3.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin Corporation or McDonald's Corporation?

LMT earns 24.8% ROIC versus MCD's 18.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Lockheed Martin Corporation's or McDonald's Corporation's?

LMT's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to MCD's 69/100 (Safe). LMT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.