Compare StocksLIN vs UNH

Linde plc (LIN) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, LIN is overvalued at $458, with a DCF intrinsic value of $279 and a margin of safety of -65%. UNH is fairly valued at $379, with an intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of 3%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

LIN
Linde plc
$458.34
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$378.90

Rewards

LIN
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.63 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Altman Z-Score of 3.51 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

LIN
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LIN
UNH
Valuation
$4.16B
Free Cash Flow
$24.27B
1.97%
FCF Yield
7.14%
29.61
Trailing P/E
24.34
23.44
Forward P/E
16.81
Quality & Moat
11.47%
ROIC
14.16%
18.40%
ROE
14.15%
48.35%
Gross Margin
19.72%
1.79
PEG Ratio
1.04
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.67
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.57
1.39%
Dividend Yield
2.47%
LIN: 2Ties: 1UNH: 9
LINUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LIN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LIN
$3.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.71B
Δ Market Cap
+$37.08B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LIN
50.6% Overvalued
Price is 50.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $458.34
Fair Value: $304.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
2.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 2.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $378.90
Fair Value: $389.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LIN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $458?

+14.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.9%

The market implies +14.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $379?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.4%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LIN
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LIN
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LIN
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.7%Retail & Other 11.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,371
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 10.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,387
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LIN
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.05M
REYNOLDS PAULA ROSPUT
Director
$47,912
@ $479.12 · 2026-08-18
LAMBA SANJIV
Chief Executive Officer
$999,634
@ $396.68 · 2025-12-08
REYNOLDS PAULA ROSPUT
Director
$44,134
@ $441.34 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LIN
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.89M
WOOD ROBERT L.
Director
$2.64M
@ $506.79 · 2026-05-15
DURBIN SEAN
Chief Operating Officer
$3.11M
@ $477.27 · 2026-03-10
BICHARA GUILLERMO
Officer
$2.09M
@ $480.79 · 2026-03-10
PATWARI BINOD
Officer
$502,262
@ $502.76 · 2026-02-24
BICHARA GUILLERMO
Officer
$4.54M
@ $480.45 · 2026-02-17
ANGEL STEPHEN F
Director
$23.82M
@ $473.38 · 2025-08-07
DURBIN SEAN
Officer
$3.31M
@ $456.45 · 2025-05-22
BICHARA GUILLERMO
Officer
$2.23M
@ $461.65 · 2025-03-11
STRAUSS DAVID PAUL
Officer
$1.16M
@ $469.74 · 2025-03-03
NOWICKI JUERGEN
Officer
$3.12M
@ $459.62 · 2025-02-20
PATWARI BINOD
Officer
$640,570
@ $457.55 · 2025-02-18
WOOD ROBERT L.
Director
$1.32M
@ $456.26 · 2025-02-10
STRAUSS DAVID PAUL
Officer
$963,388
@ $434.35 · 2024-12-16
BICHARA GUILLERMO
Officer
$2.02M
@ $460.72 · 2024-12-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $944,910
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$455,910
@ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$205,000
@ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LIN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LIN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View LIN Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LIN vs UNH

Is Linde plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a 2.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $389 vs. price $379), compared to LIN's -64.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $279 vs. $458).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Linde plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while LIN scores 63/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LIN scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Linde plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Linde plc's 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Linde plc or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 14.2% ROIC versus LIN's 11.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Linde plc's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

LIN's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). LIN has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

LIN vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io