Compare StocksLII vs NVDA

Lennox International, Inc. (LII) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, LII is undervalued at $416, with a DCF intrinsic value of $557 and a margin of safety of 25%. NVDA is overvalued at $201, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, LII has the wider margin of safety.

LII
Lennox International, Inc.
$415.88
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$200.75

Rewards

LII
  • Lennox International, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lennox International, Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 47.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
NVDA
  • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

LII
  • High leverage (1.52x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.37 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
NVDA
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 28 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LII
NVDA
Valuation
$638.80M
Free Cash Flow
$96.68B
4.44%
FCF Yield
1.99%
18.48
Trailing P/E
30.79
15.80
Forward P/E
15.57
Quality & Moat
28.82%
ROIC
63.06%
71.76%
ROE
114.29%
33.33%
Gross Margin
74.14%
1.25
PEG Ratio
0.55
Balance Sheet Safety
1.52
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.68
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.24
1.31%
Dividend Yield
0.50%
LII: 3Ties: 2NVDA: 7
LIINVDA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LII

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NVDA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LII
$4.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.41B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NVDA
$16.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$220.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.66T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LII
25.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $415.88
Fair Value: $556.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NVDA
46.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 46.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $200.75
Fair Value: $378.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LII

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $416?

+7.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.1%

The market implies +7.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NVDA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $201?

+17.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +17.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LII
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NVDA
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LII
-1.37
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NVDA
-1.06
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LII
Insiders 9.6%Institutions 79.9%Retail & Other 10.5%
No. of Institutional Holders946
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NVDA
Insiders 4.0%Institutions 70.7%Retail & Other 25.3%
No. of Institutional Holders7,576
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LII
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NVDA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LII
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.45M
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$529,001
@ $544.80 · 2026-05-06
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$54,001
@ $540.01 · 2026-02-25
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$136,271
@ $536.50 · 2026-02-04
TESKE TODD J
Director
$373,415
@ $533.45 · 2026-02-04
TESKE TODD J
Director
$295,110
@ $491.85 · 2025-11-11
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$177,558
@ $591.86 · 2025-08-22
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$657,665
@ $607.82 · 2025-08-20
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$222,394
@ $609.30 · 2025-08-20
SESSA DANIEL M
Officer
$1.86M
@ $670.04 · 2025-07-23
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$14.88M
@ $666.20 · 2025-07-23
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.96M
@ $613.72 · 2025-07-10
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.93M
@ $606.00 · 2025-07-03
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$1.91M
@ $600.00 · 2025-07-01
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$289,140
@ $568.06 · 2025-05-07
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$124,975
@ $644.20 · 2025-02-21
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$1.04M
@ $582.55 · 2025-02-04
BUCK SHERRY L
Director
$330,370
@ $660.74 · 2024-11-27
TESKE TODD J
Director
$337,760
@ $675.52 · 2024-11-25
KOSEL CHRIS A
Officer
$125,098
@ $625.49 · 2024-11-13
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$596,370
@ $618.00 · 2024-11-05
NASSAB JOSEPH
Officer
$398,091
@ $619.12 · 2024-11-05
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$199,215
@ $612.97 · 2024-10-28
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$360,789
@ $620.98 · 2024-10-25
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$3.14M
@ $584.00 · 2024-08-28
BUCK SHERRY L
Director
$291,735
@ $583.47 · 2024-08-23
QUINTOS KAREN H.
Director
$1.02M
@ $574.87 · 2024-08-20
NORRIS JOHN W III
Director
$976,412
@ $574.36 · 2024-08-20
BEDAPUDI PRAKASH
Chief Technology Officer
$1.98M
@ $578.00 · 2024-08-19
BEDARD GARY S
Officer
$685,351
@ $576.41 · 2024-08-19
WALL SHANE D.
Director
$201,831
@ $576.66 · 2024-08-19
TESKE TODD J
Director
$1.15M
@ $574.05 · 2024-08-19
SESSA DANIEL M
Officer
$7.68M
@ $570.97 · 2024-08-16
TORRES JOHN D
Officer
$4.12M
@ $571.21 · 2024-08-16
NASSAB JOSEPH
Officer
$664,195
@ $570.12 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NVDA
1
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $743.42M
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$133,750
@ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$942,944
@ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$3.36M
@ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$555,440
@ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$15.19M
@ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$4.43M
@ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$112,317
@ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.73M
@ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.06M
@ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.34M
@ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.89M
@ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.05M
@ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.09M
@ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.23M
@ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.21M
@ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.18M
@ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$617,298
@ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.75M
@ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.01M
@ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.61M
@ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
Director
$15.38M
@ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$27.12M
@ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.96M
@ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.66M
@ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.78M
@ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.18M
@ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.16M
@ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.22M
@ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.71M
@ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$37.59M
@ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$36.43M
@ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.55M
@ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.16M
@ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$30.47M
@ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$14.40M
@ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$646,469
@ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$91,608
@ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.74M
@ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.79M
@ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$525,585
@ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.16M
@ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$292,930
@ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$9.03M
@ $135.40 · 2024-12-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$608,775
@ $135.28 · 2024-12-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LII
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(15/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NVDA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LII
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (15)
NVDA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View LII Full AnalysisView NVDA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LII vs NVDA

Is Lennox International, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, LII trades at a 25.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $557 vs. price $416), compared to NVDA's -22.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $201).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Lennox International, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

LII scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Lennox International, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

Lennox International, Inc. (LII) generates a 4.4% free cash flow yield, compared to NVIDIA Corporation's 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Lennox International, Inc. or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVDA earns 63.1% ROIC versus LII's 28.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Lennox International, Inc.'s or NVIDIA Corporation's?

LII's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to NVDA's 91/100 (Very Safe). LII has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Does Lennox International, Inc. have accounting red flags?

LII's Beneish M-Score of -1.4 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, NVDA scores -1.1, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.