Compare StocksLHX vs ORCL

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, LHX is undervalued at $277, with a DCF intrinsic value of $356 and a margin of safety of 22%. ORCL is undervalued at $130, with an intrinsic value of $404 and a margin of safety of 68%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$277.06
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$129.87

Rewards

LHX
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.36 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ORCL
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

LHX
  • 8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (3.15x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LHX
ORCL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-24.54B
N/A
FCF Yield
-6.56%
28.01
Trailing P/E
22.28
20.39
Forward P/E
11.93
Quality & Moat
3.20%
ROIC
9.15%
7.01%
ROE
53.38%
30.41%
Gross Margin
65.82%
1.58
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Net Debt / Equity
3.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.23
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.44
1.80%
Dividend Yield
1.54%
LHX: 3Ties: 1ORCL: 6
LHXORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LHX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LHX
$9.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$3.51
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$87.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LHX
22.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 22.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $277.06
Fair Value: $355.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
67.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 67.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $129.87
Fair Value: $403.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LHX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LHX
59/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LHX
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LHX
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 9.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,100
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 15.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,502
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LHX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LHX
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $45.82M
RAKITA MELANIE
Officer
$676,781
@ $310.45 · 2026-05-05
RAMBEAU JON
Officer
$2.05M
@ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
MEHTA SAMIR
Officer
$2.05M
@ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
RAKITA MELANIE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $348.38 · 2026-03-02
MEHTA SAMIR
Officer
$1.64M
@ $338.85 · 2026-02-05
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$4.27M
@ $301.05 · 2025-11-13
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$23.23M
@ $279.90 · 2025-09-12
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$10.82M
@ $269.52 · 2025-08-11
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$19.52M
@ $271.14 · 2025-07-29
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$8.76M
@ $248.39 · 2025-06-12
ZOISS EDWARD J
President
$490,000
@ $245.00 · 2025-05-27
RAMBEAU JON
Officer
$718,228
@ $226.00 · 2025-03-10
ZOISS EDWARD J
Officer
$1.09M
@ $211.68 · 2025-03-07
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$288,412
@ $210.06 · 2024-12-30
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$376,879
@ $213.65 · 2024-12-23
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$394,466
@ $223.62 · 2024-12-16
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$845,000
@ $260.00 · 2024-11-08
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$740,815
@ $247.93 · 2024-11-04
KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.30M
@ $248.11 · 2024-10-31
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$731,104
@ $244.68 · 2024-10-02
NIEBERGALL ROSS
Officer
$707,200
@ $236.68 · 2024-09-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $126.77M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LHX
FearGreed
😨Fear(34/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LHX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
View LHX Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LHX vs ORCL

Is L3Harris Technologies, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 67.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $404 vs. price $130), compared to LHX's 22.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $356 vs. $277).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while LHX scores 59/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LHX scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL earns 9.2% ROIC versus LHX's 3.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s or Oracle Corporation's?

LHX's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). LHX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

LHX vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io