Compare StocksLH vs TSLA

Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, LH is overvalued at $309, with a DCF intrinsic value of $213 and a margin of safety of -45%. TSLA is overvalued at $311, with an intrinsic value of $143 and a margin of safety of -118%. Of the two, LH has the wider margin of safety.

LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$309.20
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$311.21

Rewards

LH
    TSLA
    • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

    Risks

    LH
    • 18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    TSLA
    • ROIC has declined by 21.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 18.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    LH
    TSLA
    Valuation
    $1.21B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.84B
    4.82%
    FCF Yield
    0.39%
    25.57
    Trailing P/E
    285.51
    15.65
    Forward P/E
    140.23
    Quality & Moat
    9.02%
    ROIC
    1.11%
    11.73%
    ROE
    4.67%
    28.88%
    Gross Margin
    18.85%
    1.31
    PEG Ratio
    4.56
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.77
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.86
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -2.55
    0.93%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    LH: 8Ties: 1TSLA: 3
    LHTSLA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    LH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TSLA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    LH
    $2.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.30B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TSLA
    $50.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $25.92B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.30T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    LH
    44.9% Overvalued
    Price is 44.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $309.20
    Fair Value: $213.39
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TSLA
    425.3% Overvalued
    Price is 425.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $311.21
    Fair Value: $59.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    LH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $309?

    +12.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.4%

    The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    TSLA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $311?

    +47.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +43.3%

    The market implies +47.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +43.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    LH
    52/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TSLA
    31/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    LH
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TSLA
    -2.86
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    LH
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 102.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,406
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TSLA
    Insiders 17.8%Institutions 42.7%Retail & Other 39.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,241
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    LH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TSLA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999.96M
    MUSK ELON REEVE
    Chief Executive Officer
    $999.96M
    @ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
    GEBBIA JOSEPH
    Director
    $1.03M
    @ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    LH
    4
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.10M
    KYLE KATHRYN W
    Officer
    $26,329
    @ $286.18 · 2026-07-02
    VAUGHN BRYAN T
    Officer
    $66,968
    @ $286.19 · 2026-07-02
    KYLE KATHRYN W
    Officer
    $201,084
    @ $263.89 · 2026-06-08
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $254.50 · 2026-05-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $224,055
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $436,093
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $156,000
    @ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $429,458
    @ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $185,108
    @ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,267
    @ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,188
    @ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $24,247
    @ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
    PARHAM RICHELLE P
    Director
    $1.78M
    @ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $529,900
    @ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $52,727
    @ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $980,000
    @ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $132,500
    @ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $130,000
    @ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $494,000
    @ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $452,884
    @ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $200,838
    @ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    Chief Operating Officer
    $610,450
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $175,606
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $127,817
    @ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    President
    $1.33M
    @ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $330,208
    @ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $56,590
    @ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $347,739
    @ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $235,000
    @ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
    EISENBERG GLENN A
    Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $241,000
    @ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $877,142
    @ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $239,419
    @ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $230,000
    @ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $454,100
    @ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
    EISENBERG GLENN A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.36M
    @ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $225,000
    @ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
    BERBERIAN LANCE V
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TSLA
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $60.94M
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $402.27 · 2026-06-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $450.00 · 2026-05-13
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $9.99M
    @ $378.11 · 2026-04-30
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $9.27M
    @ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $899,077
    @ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $10.69M
    @ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $25.61M
    @ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.17M
    @ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $918,137
    @ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $732,573
    @ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
    EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
    Director
    $170.64M
    @ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $32.73M
    @ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $30.81M
    @ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.14M
    @ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $32.10M
    @ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
    MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
    Director
    $13.19M
    @ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $718,111
    @ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $33.67M
    @ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $27.59M
    @ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $43.16M
    @ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.89M
    @ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $41.16M
    @ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $975,015
    @ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $35.25M
    @ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $39.79M
    @ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.48M
    @ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
    DENHOLM ROBYN M
    Director
    $35.34M
    @ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.80M
    @ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
    WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
    Director
    $34.60M
    @ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
    MUSK KIMBAL J
    Director
    $15.14M
    @ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
    TANEJA VAIBHAV
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
    ZHU XIAOTONG
    Officer
    $65,867
    @ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    LH
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(72/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TSLA
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(26/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    LH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
    TSLA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
    View LH Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: LH vs TSLA

    Is Labcorp Holdings Inc. or Tesla, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, LH trades at a -44.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $213 vs. price $309), compared to TSLA's -117.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $143 vs. $311).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Labcorp Holdings Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

    LH scores 52/100 (Narrow moat), while TSLA scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Labcorp Holdings Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

    Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) generates a 4.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Tesla, Inc.'s 0.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Labcorp Holdings Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

    LH earns 9.0% ROIC versus TSLA's 1.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.