Compare StocksLH vs ORCL

Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$264.09
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$155.52

Rewards

LH
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.13 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

LH
  • 8 insider sales totaling $4.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LH
ORCL
Valuation
$966.63M
Free Cash Flow
$-22.30B
4.42%
FCF Yield
-4.99%
25.25
Trailing P/E
27.92
13.70
Forward P/E
19.51
Quality & Moat
7.67%
ROIC
8.22%
10.15%
ROE
31.86%
28.76%
Gross Margin
67.08%
1.61
PEG Ratio
1.14
Balance Sheet Safety
0.76
Debt / Equity
4.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.48
1.09%
Dividend Yield
1.29%
LH: 6Ties: 1ORCL: 5
LHORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LH
$2.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LH
60.6% Overvalued
Price is 60.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $264.09
Fair Value: $164.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
235.9% Overvalued
Price is 235.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $155.52
Fair Value: $46.30
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $264?

+14.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.7%

The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LH
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LH
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 100.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,392
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.3%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders4,769
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LH
8
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.92M
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$156,000
@ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$429,458
@ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$185,108
@ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,267
@ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,188
@ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$24,247
@ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
PARHAM RICHELLE P
Director
$1.78M
@ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$1.06M
@ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$529,900
@ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$52,727
@ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$980,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$132,500
@ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$130,000
@ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$494,000
@ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$452,884
@ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$200,838
@ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Chief Operating Officer
$610,450
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$175,606
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$127,817
@ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
SCHROEDER MARK S
President
$1.33M
@ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$330,208
@ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$56,590
@ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$347,739
@ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$235,000
@ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
EISENBERG GLENN A
Officer
$2.82M
@ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$241,000
@ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$877,142
@ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$239,419
@ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$230,000
@ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$454,100
@ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
EISENBERG GLENN A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.36M
@ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$225,000
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
BERBERIAN LANCE V
Chief Technology Officer
$2.77M
@ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$421,655
@ $210.83 · 2024-05-14
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$101,058
@ $202.12 · 2024-05-02
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$498,358
@ $204.33 · 2024-04-29
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$760,515
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Officer
$1.41M
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$770,077
@ $216.74 · 2024-03-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
4
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.90B
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
BOSKIN MICHAEL J
Director
$5.30M
@ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$2.32M
@ $116.00 · 2024-05-03
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$2.90M
@ $116.13 · 2024-05-01
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$346.77M
@ $126.10 · 2024-03-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View LH Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis
Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io