Compare Stocks › LH vs MSFT
Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$264.09
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$389.02
Rewards
LH
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.13 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
MSFT
- ★Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
Risks
LH
- ⚠8 insider sales totaling $4.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
- ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
MSFT
- ⚠FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →LH
MSFT
Valuation
$966.63M
Free Cash Flow
$71.61B
4.42%
FCF Yield
2.48%
25.25
Trailing P/E
24.33
13.70
Forward P/E
20.64
Quality & Moat
7.67%
ROIC
22.10%
10.15%
ROE
26.05%
28.76%
Gross Margin
68.59%
1.61
PEG Ratio
0.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.76
Debt / Equity
0.32
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.19
1.09%
Dividend Yield
0.94%
LH: 3Ties: 2MSFT: 7
LHMSFT
Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →LH
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
MSFT
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →LH
$2.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →LH
60.6% Overvalued
Price is 60.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $264.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $164.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
0.5% Overvalued
Price is 0.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $389.02
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Fair Value: $387.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →LH
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $264?
+14.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.7%
The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
MSFT
What growth rate is the market pricing in at $389?
+12.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.4%
The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.
Standard FCF implies +17.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →LH
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None
Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.
Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →LH
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →LH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 100.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,392
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.0%Retail & Other 23.9%
No. of Institutional Holders8,054
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →LH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.44M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →LH
8
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.92M
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$156,000
@ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$429,458
@ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$185,108
@ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,267
@ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,188
@ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$24,247
@ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
PARHAM RICHELLE P
Director
$1.78M
@ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$1.06M
@ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$529,900
@ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$52,727
@ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$980,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$132,500
@ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$130,000
@ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$494,000
@ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$452,884
@ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$200,838
@ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Chief Operating Officer
$610,450
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$175,606
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$127,817
@ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
SCHROEDER MARK S
President
$1.33M
@ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$330,208
@ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$56,590
@ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$347,739
@ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$235,000
@ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
EISENBERG GLENN A
Officer
$2.82M
@ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$241,000
@ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$877,142
@ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$239,419
@ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$230,000
@ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$454,100
@ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
EISENBERG GLENN A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.36M
@ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$225,000
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
BERBERIAN LANCE V
Chief Technology Officer
$2.77M
@ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$421,655
@ $210.83 · 2024-05-14
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$101,058
@ $202.12 · 2024-05-02
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$498,358
@ $204.33 · 2024-04-29
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$760,515
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Officer
$1.41M
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$770,077
@ $216.74 · 2024-03-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $172.43M
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$235,535
@ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.64M
@ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →LH
😐Neutral(50/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
😐Neutral(43/100)
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →LH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
MSFT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)