Compare StocksLDOS vs META

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, LDOS is undervalued at $107, with a DCF intrinsic value of $205 and a margin of safety of 48%. META is fairly valued at $577, with an intrinsic value of $679 and a margin of safety of 15%. Of the two, LDOS has the wider margin of safety.

LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$107.12
VS
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$577.22

Rewards

LDOS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
META
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 81.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

LDOS
  • Gross margin of 17.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • PEG ratio of 2.46 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
META
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Insiders have sold $6.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
LDOS
META
Valuation
$1.63B
Free Cash Flow
$46.11B
12.06%
FCF Yield
3.15%
9.80
Trailing P/E
21.01
8.15
Forward P/E
15.93
Quality & Moat
13.94%
ROIC
20.87%
30.58%
ROE
32.93%
17.91%
Gross Margin
81.94%
2.46
PEG Ratio
0.83
Balance Sheet Safety
1.28
Net Debt / Equity
0.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.05
1.61%
Dividend Yield
0.36%
LDOS: 4Ties: 1META: 7
LDOSMETA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
LDOS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
LDOS
$3.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.28B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.39B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
LDOS
47.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 47.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $107.12
Fair Value: $204.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
META
14.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 14.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $577.22
Fair Value: $678.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
LDOS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

+1.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies +1.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $577?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
LDOS
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
LDOS
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
LDOS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 82.0%Retail & Other 17.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,240
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 79.3%Retail & Other 20.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,598
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
LDOS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GEER NOEL BROWN
Director
$322,261
@ $161.13 · 2024-11-20
BELL THOMAS ARTHUR
Chief Executive Officer
$248,305
@ $145.04 · 2024-08-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
LDOS
2
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.50M
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$197,005
@ $132.75 · 2026-05-07
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$317,555
@ $158.78 · 2026-04-07
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$576,635
@ $192.21 · 2026-01-20
PORTER ELIZABETH A
Officer
$543,130
@ $181.04 · 2025-12-19
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$2.23M
@ $178.14 · 2025-09-04
STEVENS ROY E
Officer
$493,398
@ $181.66 · 2025-08-25
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$2.30M
@ $178.27 · 2025-08-20
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$356,104
@ $178.05 · 2025-08-11
DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
Director
$168,911
@ $177.43 · 2025-08-11
HULL STEPHEN EDWARD
Officer
$1.33M
@ $176.39 · 2025-08-08
DAHLBERG GREGORY R.
Director
$193,190
@ $154.55 · 2025-05-09
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$279,279
@ $131.24 · 2025-02-18
KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
Director
$203,322
@ $134.56 · 2025-02-13
STEVENS ROY E
Officer
$229,219
@ $201.60 · 2024-11-12
MOHAPATRA SURYA N
Director
$535,784
@ $194.97 · 2024-11-07
KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
Director
$193,632
@ $184.94 · 2024-10-31
MAY GARY STEPHEN
Director
$144,017
@ $144.02 · 2024-08-13
KOVARIK ROBERT C JR
Director
$153,799
@ $145.23 · 2024-08-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
META
4
Sells (3M)
62
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $57.96M
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$326,227
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,932
@ $628.00 · 2025-11-04
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$339,152
@ $656.00 · 2025-11-03
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$390,807
@ $753.00 · 2025-10-28
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,528
@ $749.57 · 2025-10-27
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$382,176
@ $736.37 · 2025-10-21
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$372,912
@ $721.30 · 2025-10-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$333,391
@ $716.97 · 2025-10-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$367,374
@ $707.85 · 2025-10-14
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$368,797
@ $713.34 · 2025-10-13
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$372,113
@ $716.98 · 2025-10-07
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$364,387
@ $704.81 · 2025-10-06
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$384,838
@ $741.50 · 2025-09-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,088
@ $748.72 · 2025-09-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$399,215
@ $769.20 · 2025-09-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$403,948
@ $781.33 · 2025-09-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$398,156
@ $767.16 · 2025-09-16
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$391,612
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$352,224
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$393,142
@ $757.50 · 2025-09-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,671
@ $755.65 · 2025-09-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$376,924
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$375,471
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$389,494
@ $750.47 · 2025-08-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,392
@ $755.11 · 2025-08-25
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$402,225
@ $775.00 · 2025-08-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$13.02M
@ $777.15 · 2025-08-18
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$2.44M
@ $780.95 · 2025-08-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
LDOS
FearGreed
😨Fear(21/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
META
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
LDOS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (21)
META
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View LDOS Full AnalysisView META Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: LDOS vs META

Is Leidos Holdings, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, LDOS trades at a 47.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $205 vs. price $107), compared to META's 14.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $679 vs. $577).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Leidos Holdings, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while LDOS scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Leidos Holdings, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) generates a 12.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Meta Platforms, Inc.'s 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Leidos Holdings, Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

META earns 20.9% ROIC versus LDOS's 13.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s or Meta Platforms, Inc.'s?

LDOS's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to META's 88/100 (Very Safe). LDOS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.