Compare Stocks › L vs TXN

Loews Corporation (L) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, L is undervalued at $111, with a DCF intrinsic value of $610 and a margin of safety of 82%. TXN is undervalued at $301, with an intrinsic value of $391 and a margin of safety of 23%. Of the two, L has the wider margin of safety.

L
Loews Corporation
$111.32
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$300.84

Rewards

L
  • ★Loews Corporation scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.24 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TXN
  • ★Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

L
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.69 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TXN
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 39.0x is 44% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
L
TXN
Valuation
$2.70B
Free Cash Flow
$4.78B
11.86%
FCF Yield
1.74%
13.64
Trailing P/E
39.02
38.39
Forward P/E
26.11
Quality & Moat
7.41%
ROIC
23.82%
9.31%
ROE
39.72%
36.29%
Gross Margin
60.24%
1.32
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
0.13
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.78
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.51
0.22%
Dividend Yield
2.02%
L: 3Ties: 1TXN: 8
LTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
L

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
L
$1.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.35B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
L
81.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 81.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $111.32
Fair Value: $609.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
11.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $300.84
Fair Value: $339.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
L

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $111?

+3.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $301?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.4%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
L
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
L
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
L
Insiders 20.1%Institutions 61.7%Retail & Other 18.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,114
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.9%Retail & Other 7.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,691
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
L
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.05M
ROBUSTO DINO E
Director
$523,700
@ $104.74 · 2026-05-29
ROBUSTO DINO E
Director
$527,200
@ $105.44 · 2026-05-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
L
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.67M
SCHWARTZ MARK S
Officer and Treasurer
$346,500
@ $110.00 · 2026-02-17
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$211,728
@ $110.16 · 2026-02-10
ALPERT MARC A
General Counsel
$383,983
@ $109.87 · 2026-02-10
SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
Chief Investment Officer
$104,740
@ $104.74 · 2025-12-11
DIKER CHARLES M
Director
$155,635
@ $107.93 · 2025-12-01
HARRIS WALTER L
Director
$155,563
@ $107.88 · 2025-12-01
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$156,096
@ $108.10 · 2025-12-01
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$155,923
@ $108.13 · 2025-12-01
DIKER CHARLES M
Director
$137,593
@ $96.76 · 2025-09-02
HARRIS WALTER L
Director
$137,396
@ $96.69 · 2025-09-02
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$137,465
@ $96.67 · 2025-09-02
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$137,493
@ $96.69 · 2025-09-02
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$113,068
@ $88.82 · 2025-06-03
DIKER CHARLES M
Director
$112,583
@ $88.37 · 2025-06-02
HARRIS WALTER L
Director
$113,157
@ $88.82 · 2025-06-02
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$113,068
@ $88.82 · 2025-06-02
SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
Chief Investment Officer
$792,950
@ $87.92 · 2025-05-08
DIKER CHARLES M
Director
$103,816
@ $86.73 · 2025-03-03
HARRIS WALTER L
Director
$103,983
@ $86.87 · 2025-03-03
WELTERS ANTHONY
Director
$103,983
@ $86.87 · 2025-03-03
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$104,019
@ $86.90 · 2025-03-03
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$104,007
@ $86.89 · 2025-03-03
SCOTT RICHARD WALDO
Chief Investment Officer
$689,405
@ $84.60 · 2025-02-25
ALPERT MARC A
General Counsel
$382,680
@ $85.04 · 2025-02-11
TISCH JONATHAN M.
Retired
$639,494
@ $86.81 · 2025-02-07
TISCH ANDREW H
Divisional Officer
$1.37M
@ $84.67 · 2025-01-03
TISCH JONATHAN M.
Divisional Officer
$1.38M
@ $84.86 · 2025-01-02
DIKER CHARLES M
Director
$99,507
@ $86.83 · 2024-12-02
HARRIS WALTER L
Director
$99,278
@ $86.63 · 2024-12-02
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$99,484
@ $86.81 · 2024-12-02
WELTERS ANTHONY
Director
$99,484
@ $86.81 · 2024-12-02
BERMAN ANN E
Director
$99,106
@ $86.48 · 2024-12-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
4
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $119.37M
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$1.83M
@ $302.21 · 2026-10-27
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.37M
@ $301.56 · 2026-10-27
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.30M
@ $302.46 · 2026-10-27
ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
Officer
$1.85M
@ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
L
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
L
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
TXN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View L Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: L vs TXN

Is Loews Corporation or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, L trades at a 81.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $610 vs. price $111), compared to TXN's 23.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $391 vs. $301).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Loews Corporation or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

L scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Loews Corporation in financial distress?▼

L's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TXN scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Loews Corporation or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

Loews Corporation (L) generates a 11.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Loews Corporation or Texas Instruments Incorporated?▼

TXN earns 23.8% ROIC versus L's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Loews Corporation's or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?▼

L's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). L has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

L vs TXN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io