Compare StocksKMI vs TSLA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$32.30
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$391.81

Rewards

KMI
  • PEG ratio of 0.60 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TSLA
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

KMI
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 6 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TSLA
  • ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KMI
TSLA
Valuation
$2.89B
Free Cash Flow
$5.25B
4.02%
FCF Yield
0.36%
21.68
Trailing P/E
359.45
21.47
Forward P/E
154.54
Quality & Moat
6.39%
ROIC
3.23%
9.38%
ROE
4.47%
49.45%
Gross Margin
19.06%
0.60
PEG Ratio
43.31
Balance Sheet Safety
0.99
Debt / Equity
0.19
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.60
3.61%
Dividend Yield
N/A
KMI: 7Ties: 1TSLA: 3
KMITSLA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KMI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KMI
$55.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$370.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$20.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KMI
245.8% Overvalued
Price is 245.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $32.30
Fair Value: $9.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
542.7% Overvalued
Price is 542.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $391.81
Fair Value: $60.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KMI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

+15.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $392?

+49.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +44.8%

The market implies +49.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +44.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KMI
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KMI
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KMI
Insiders 12.8%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,185
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.7%Retail & Other 44.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,238
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KMI
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.24M
SMITH WILLIAM A
Director
$89,236
@ $29.75 · 2026-02-02
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$112,443
@ $26.23 · 2025-10-31
KINDER RICHARD D
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$25.96M
@ $25.96 · 2025-10-27
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$75,059
@ $27.21 · 2025-07-28
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$55,790
@ $24.90 · 2024-11-05
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$200,986
@ $20.65 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999.96M
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KMI
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.45M
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Divisional Officer
$49,168
@ $31.72 · 2026-04-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$203,071
@ $32.93 · 2026-04-06
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Officer
$51,609
@ $33.30 · 2026-03-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$207,640
@ $33.67 · 2026-03-05
ASHLEY ANTHONY B
Officer
$255,560
@ $31.95 · 2026-02-17
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$185,523
@ $30.09 · 2026-02-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$600,000
@ $30.00 · 2026-01-22
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$169,491
@ $27.49 · 2026-01-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,476
@ $27.81 · 2025-12-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-11-10
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$173,709
@ $28.17 · 2025-10-06
GRAHMANN KEVIN P
Officer
$658,908
@ $27.61 · 2025-09-15
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-09-08
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$814,999
@ $27.05 · 2025-08-11
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,446
@ $27.81 · 2025-08-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $28.19 · 2025-08-04
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$1.27M
@ $27.96 · 2025-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$508,676
@ $28.26 · 2025-06-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$496,255
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-07
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$479,018
@ $26.61 · 2025-03-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$2.01M
@ $26.65 · 2025-02-18
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$498,521
@ $27.70 · 2025-02-05
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,294
@ $27.91 · 2025-01-02
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$492,079
@ $27.34 · 2024-12-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,530
@ $26.28 · 2024-11-06
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$1.11M
@ $21.00 · 2024-08-14
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$529,553
@ $21.04 · 2024-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$2.10M
@ $21.01 · 2024-08-01
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$455,078
@ $21.25 · 2024-07-24
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$987,515
@ $19.75 · 2024-05-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $294.75M
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.27M
@ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$14.60M
@ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$113,151
@ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$17.32M
@ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KMI
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KMI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
TSLA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View KMI Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis
KMI vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io