Compare StocksKMI vs QCOM

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$32.28
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$167.42

Rewards

KMI
  • PEG ratio of 0.60 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

KMI
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 6 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KMI
QCOM
Valuation
$2.89B
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
4.03%
FCF Yield
7.27%
21.66
Trailing P/E
18.02
21.45
Forward P/E
15.75
Quality & Moat
6.39%
ROIC
18.22%
9.38%
ROE
20.31%
49.45%
Gross Margin
54.80%
0.60
PEG Ratio
0.10
Balance Sheet Safety
0.99
Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
3.61%
Dividend Yield
2.08%
KMI: 1Ties: 1QCOM: 10
KMIQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KMI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KMI
$55.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$370.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$20.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KMI
245.6% Overvalued
Price is 245.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $32.28
Fair Value: $9.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
122.4% Overvalued
Price is 122.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $167.42
Fair Value: $75.29
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KMI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

+15.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $167?

+14.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.0%

The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KMI
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KMI
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KMI
Insiders 12.8%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,185
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,708
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KMI
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.24M
SMITH WILLIAM A
Director
$89,236
@ $29.75 · 2026-02-02
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$112,443
@ $26.23 · 2025-10-31
KINDER RICHARD D
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$25.96M
@ $25.96 · 2025-10-27
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$75,059
@ $27.21 · 2025-07-28
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$55,790
@ $24.90 · 2024-11-05
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$200,986
@ $20.65 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KMI
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.45M
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Divisional Officer
$49,168
@ $31.72 · 2026-04-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$203,071
@ $32.93 · 2026-04-06
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Officer
$51,609
@ $33.30 · 2026-03-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$207,640
@ $33.67 · 2026-03-05
ASHLEY ANTHONY B
Officer
$255,560
@ $31.95 · 2026-02-17
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$185,523
@ $30.09 · 2026-02-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$600,000
@ $30.00 · 2026-01-22
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$169,491
@ $27.49 · 2026-01-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,476
@ $27.81 · 2025-12-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-11-10
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$173,709
@ $28.17 · 2025-10-06
GRAHMANN KEVIN P
Officer
$658,908
@ $27.61 · 2025-09-15
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-09-08
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$814,999
@ $27.05 · 2025-08-11
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,446
@ $27.81 · 2025-08-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $28.19 · 2025-08-04
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$1.27M
@ $27.96 · 2025-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$508,676
@ $28.26 · 2025-06-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$496,255
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-07
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$479,018
@ $26.61 · 2025-03-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$2.01M
@ $26.65 · 2025-02-18
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$498,521
@ $27.70 · 2025-02-05
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,294
@ $27.91 · 2025-01-02
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$492,079
@ $27.34 · 2024-12-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,530
@ $26.28 · 2024-11-06
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$1.11M
@ $21.00 · 2024-08-14
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$529,553
@ $21.04 · 2024-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$2.10M
@ $21.01 · 2024-08-01
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$455,078
@ $21.25 · 2024-07-24
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$987,515
@ $19.75 · 2024-05-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.70M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$497,848
@ $165.95 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KMI
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KMI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View KMI Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis
KMI vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io