Compare StocksKLAC vs UNH

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

KLAC
KLA Corporation
$1726.26
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78

Rewards

KLAC
  • KLA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 61.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • KLA Corporation scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

KLAC
  • FCF yield of 1.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 48.8x is 88% above the historical average of 25.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 4.13 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KLAC
UNH
Valuation
$2.89B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
1.27%
FCF Yield
5.28%
48.78
Trailing P/E
27.85
34.80
Forward P/E
17.77
Quality & Moat
35.61%
ROIC
15.60%
69.66%
ROE
11.45%
61.45%
Gross Margin
18.80%
4.13
PEG Ratio
39.79
Balance Sheet Safety
1.05
Debt / Equity
0.74
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.20
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.44%
Dividend Yield
2.40%
KLAC: 5Ties: 1UNH: 6
KLACUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KLAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KLAC
$13.71
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.80B
Δ Market Cap
+$106.95B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KLAC
22.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 22.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1726.26
Fair Value: $2238.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
9.6% Overvalued
Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.78
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KLAC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1726?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +26.6%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KLAC
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KLAC
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KLAC
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 6.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,680
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KLAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KLAC
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.04M
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.79M
@ $1237.01 · 2025-12-16
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$13.00M
@ $1203.10 · 2025-11-11
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$4.11M
@ $900.00 · 2025-09-05
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$12.09M
@ $881.50 · 2025-08-29
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.02M
@ $878.53 · 2025-08-20
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$7.35M
@ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.87M
@ $913.68 · 2025-08-12
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$933,086
@ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$308,594
@ $913.00 · 2025-08-08
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$1.76M
@ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$468,587
@ $917.00 · 2025-08-05
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$684,220
@ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$286,960
@ $896.75 · 2025-08-04
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$34,768
@ $891.49 · 2025-07-02
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$1.18M
@ $891.16 · 2025-06-30
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$781,023
@ $766.46 · 2025-05-22
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$7.38M
@ $683.30 · 2025-05-06
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.08M
@ $724.62 · 2025-03-25
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.49M
@ $663.01 · 2024-11-12
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$7.92M
@ $818.51 · 2024-08-19
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $740.63 · 2024-08-07
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.97M
@ $740.63 · 2024-08-07
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$910,168
@ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$12.29M
@ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$573,878
@ $705.01 · 2024-08-06
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$460,737
@ $649.84 · 2024-08-05
WILKINSON MARY BETH
Officer
$1.70M
@ $652.17 · 2024-08-05
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$536,118
@ $649.84 · 2024-08-05
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$36,054
@ $819.41 · 2024-07-02
KIRLOSKAR VIRENDRA A
Officer
$36,054
@ $819.41 · 2024-07-02
HIGGINS BREN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$803,563
@ $788.58 · 2024-05-23
KHAN AHMAD A
Officer
$5.95M
@ $760.00 · 2024-05-21
WALLACE RICHARD P
Chief Executive Officer
$10.04M
@ $716.63 · 2024-05-07
LORIG BRIAN W.
Officer
$2.47M
@ $699.16 · 2024-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KLAC
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KLAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View KLAC Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis
KLAC vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io