Compare StocksKEYS vs V

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, KEYS is overvalued at $364, with a DCF intrinsic value of $204 and a margin of safety of -78%. V is fairly valued at $327, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

KEYS
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
$363.67
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$327.24

Rewards

KEYS
  • Gross margin of 62.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 5.73 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

KEYS
  • ROIC has declined by 10.8 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 58.7x is 66% above the historical average of 35.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
V
  • Insiders have sold $14.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KEYS
V
Valuation
$1.09B
Free Cash Flow
$20.84B
1.75%
FCF Yield
3.35%
58.66
Trailing P/E
28.55
30.67
Forward P/E
22.02
Quality & Moat
9.95%
ROIC
38.39%
18.17%
ROE
60.35%
62.14%
Gross Margin
97.78%
1.51
PEG Ratio
1.46
Balance Sheet Safety
0.06
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.25
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.33
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
KEYS: 2Ties: 2V: 8
KEYSV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KEYS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KEYS
$1.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.26B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KEYS
78.2% Overvalued
Price is 78.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $363.67
Fair Value: $204.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
7.6% Overvalued
Price is 7.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $327.24
Fair Value: $304.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KEYS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $364?

+23.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.1%

The market implies +23.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $327?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KEYS
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KEYS
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KEYS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,574
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,856
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KEYS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
STEPHENS KEVIN A
Director
$44,520
@ $159.00 · 2025-05-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KEYS
5
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $32.63M
CULLEN JAMES G
Director
$1.04M
@ $346.58 · 2026-06-02
HAMADA RICHARD P
Director
$239,929
@ $275.78 · 2026-03-30
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$500,100
@ $300.00 · 2026-03-24
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$594,380
@ $297.19 · 2026-03-24
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$596,740
@ $298.37 · 2026-03-24
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$483,430
@ $290.00 · 2026-03-19
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$8.58M
@ $285.96 · 2026-03-17
JUSKIE JOANN ANN
Officer
$304,423
@ $304.42 · 2026-02-27
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$475,360
@ $237.68 · 2026-02-20
YOON SUNG
Officer
$183,678
@ $206.84 · 2025-12-30
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$203,719
@ $203.72 · 2025-12-22
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$3.20M
@ $213.48 · 2025-12-10
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$894,349
@ $211.43 · 2025-12-09
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$790,105
@ $200.84 · 2025-12-03
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
NARAYANAN KAILASH
Officer
$628,740
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$623,634
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$948,119
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$5.91M
@ $196.88 · 2025-11-28
POOLE LISA M
Officer
$24,646
@ $173.56 · 2025-09-17
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$347,960
@ $173.98 · 2025-09-17
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$2.01M
@ $164.60 · 2025-06-30
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$1.59M
@ $158.97 · 2025-06-20
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$103,819
@ $157.78 · 2025-05-30
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$1.16M
@ $157.78 · 2025-05-30
HAMADA RICHARD P
Director
$257,418
@ $162.00 · 2025-05-22
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$562,960
@ $155.00 · 2025-03-27
WALLACE MARK ADAM
Officer
$970,770
@ $161.79 · 2024-12-30
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$758,511
@ $171.92 · 2024-12-04
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$7.14M
@ $170.41 · 2024-12-03
GOOI SOON CHAI
Officer
$3.12M
@ $171.34 · 2024-12-03
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$658,959
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
GOOI SOON CHAI
Officer
$1.48M
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
NARAYANAN KAILASH
Officer
$101,924
@ $171.30 · 2024-11-27
POOLE LISA M
Officer
$60,126
@ $171.79 · 2024-11-25
HAMADA RICHARD P
Director
$254,592
@ $156.00 · 2024-08-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.88M
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KEYS
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KEYS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View KEYS Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: KEYS vs V

Is Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -7.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $304 vs. price $327), compared to KEYS's -78.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $204 vs. $364).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while KEYS scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

Visa Inc. (V) generates a 3.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Keysight Technologies, Inc.'s 1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 38.4% ROIC versus KEYS's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.