Compare Stocks › KEYS vs PFE

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, KEYS is overvalued at $307, with a DCF intrinsic value of $276 and a margin of safety of -11%. PFE is overvalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, KEYS has the wider margin of safety.

KEYS
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
$307.20
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52

Rewards

KEYS
  • ★Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 10.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.61 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

KEYS
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 10.8 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KEYS
PFE
Valuation
$1.87B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
3.57%
FCF Yield
7.18%
41.57
Trailing P/E
40.16
22.05
Forward P/E
10.57
Quality & Moat
14.30%
ROIC
9.42%
20.90%
ROE
5.01%
63.28%
Gross Margin
74.72%
0.61
PEG Ratio
13.98
Balance Sheet Safety
0.02
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.09
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
0.00%
Dividend Yield
5.64%
KEYS: 5Ties: 2PFE: 5
KEYSPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KEYS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KEYS
$1.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.26B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KEYS
11.2% Overvalued
Price is 11.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.20
Fair Value: $276.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KEYS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+20.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.3%

The market implies +20.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KEYS
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KEYS
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KEYS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 93.6%Retail & Other 5.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,772
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KEYS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
STEPHENS KEVIN A
Director
$44,520
@ $159.00 · 2025-05-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KEYS
3
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.81M
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$681,570
@ $340.79 · 2026-09-21
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$652,200
@ $326.10 · 2026-09-04
NYE JEAN MCCLUNG
Director
$957,660
@ $319.22 · 2026-08-21
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$681,740
@ $340.87 · 2026-06-30
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$183,189
@ $361.32 · 2026-06-25
CULLEN JAMES G
Director
$1.04M
@ $346.58 · 2026-06-02
HAMADA RICHARD P
Director
$239,929
@ $275.78 · 2026-03-30
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$500,100
@ $300.00 · 2026-03-24
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$594,380
@ $297.19 · 2026-03-24
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$596,740
@ $298.37 · 2026-03-24
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$483,430
@ $290.00 · 2026-03-19
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$8.58M
@ $285.96 · 2026-03-17
JUSKIE JOANN ANN
Officer
$304,423
@ $304.42 · 2026-02-27
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$475,360
@ $237.68 · 2026-02-20
YOON SUNG
Officer
$183,678
@ $206.84 · 2025-12-30
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$203,719
@ $203.72 · 2025-12-22
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$3.20M
@ $213.48 · 2025-12-10
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$894,349
@ $211.43 · 2025-12-09
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$790,105
@ $200.84 · 2025-12-03
NARAYANAN KAILASH
Officer
$628,740
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$623,634
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$2.46M
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$948,119
@ $196.42 · 2025-12-01
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$5.91M
@ $196.88 · 2025-11-28
POOLE LISA M
Officer
$24,646
@ $173.56 · 2025-09-17
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$347,960
@ $173.98 · 2025-09-17
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$2.01M
@ $164.60 · 2025-06-30
ESTRADA INGRID A
Officer
$1.59M
@ $158.97 · 2025-06-20
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$1.16M
@ $157.78 · 2025-05-30
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$103,819
@ $157.78 · 2025-05-30
HAMADA RICHARD P
Director
$257,418
@ $162.00 · 2025-05-22
DOUGHERTY NEIL
Chief Financial Officer
$562,960
@ $155.00 · 2025-03-27
WALLACE MARK ADAM
Officer
$970,770
@ $161.79 · 2024-12-30
LI JEFFREY K
Officer
$758,511
@ $171.92 · 2024-12-04
NERSESIAN RONALD S
Director
$7.14M
@ $170.41 · 2024-12-03
GOOI SOON CHAI
Officer
$3.12M
@ $171.34 · 2024-12-03
PAGE JOHN
Officer
$658,959
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
GOOI SOON CHAI
Officer
$1.48M
@ $169.66 · 2024-12-02
NARAYANAN KAILASH
Officer
$101,924
@ $171.30 · 2024-11-27
POOLE LISA M
Officer
$60,126
@ $171.79 · 2024-11-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KEYS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KEYS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View KEYS Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: KEYS vs PFE

Is Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, KEYS trades at a -11.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $276 vs. price $307), compared to PFE's -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

KEYS scores 52/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. KEYS scores 5.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Keysight Technologies, Inc.'s 3.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Keysight Technologies, Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

KEYS earns 14.3% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.