Compare StocksKEY vs ORCL

KeyCorp (KEY) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

KEY
KeyCorp
$19.28
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$155.52

Rewards

KEY
    ORCL
    • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    KEY
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • KeyCorp scores only 19/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 18% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    KEY
    ORCL
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-22.30B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -4.99%
    12.68
    Trailing P/E
    27.92
    9.08
    Forward P/E
    19.51
    Quality & Moat
    15.33%
    ROIC
    8.22%
    N/A
    ROE
    31.86%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    67.08%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.14
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    4.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.48
    4.25%
    Dividend Yield
    1.29%
    KEY: 4Ties: 1ORCL: 1
    KEYORCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    KEY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ORCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    KEY
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-257.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.50B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ORCL
    $17.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $18.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$329.28B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    KEY
    65.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $19.28
    Fair Value: $55.44
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ORCL
    235.9% Overvalued
    Price is 235.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $155.52
    Fair Value: $46.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    KEY

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    ORCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    KEY
    19/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ORCL
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    KEY
    -1.51
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ORCL
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    KEY
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.0%Retail & Other 9.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,202
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ORCL
    Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.3%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,769
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    KEY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $151,792
    ALLARD JACQUELINE
    Director
    $2,525
    @ $14.03 · 2025-04-22
    TOBIN RICHARD J.
    Director
    $10,380
    @ $13.84 · 2025-04-21
    KHANNA SOMESH
    Director
    $1,387
    @ $13.87 · 2025-04-21
    RAMANI MOHIT
    Officer
    $137,500
    @ $13.75 · 2025-04-21
    BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $892,500
    @ $17.85 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ORCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $112,258
    FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
    Director
    $112,258
    @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
    MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
    Director
    $947,913
    @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    KEY
    3
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.17M
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $23.23 · 2026-02-06
    MAGO ANGELA G
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $21.55 · 2026-01-29
    EVANS KATRINA M.
    Officer
    $710,789
    @ $21.74 · 2026-01-22
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $867,143
    @ $19.29 · 2025-09-09
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $880,500
    @ $17.61 · 2025-08-08
    EVANS KATRINA M.
    Officer
    $317,390
    @ $18.67 · 2025-07-24
    GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $18.86 · 2025-07-23
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $305,710
    @ $16.09 · 2025-06-12
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $83,000
    @ $16.60 · 2025-05-13
    KIDIK ALLYSON M
    Officer
    $17,973
    @ $17.69 · 2025-02-14
    GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $17.46 · 2025-02-13
    MAGO ANGELA G
    Officer
    $294,065
    @ $19.59 · 2024-11-06
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $19.03 · 2024-11-06
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $154,260
    @ $17.14 · 2024-11-05
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $719,692
    @ $16.92 · 2024-08-29
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $162,100
    @ $16.21 · 2024-08-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ORCL
    4
    Sells (3M)
    22
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.90B
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
    KEHRING DOUGLAS A
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
    HURA MARK
    Officer
    $2.95M
    @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $437,064
    @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.07M
    @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $641,958
    @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $10.87M
    @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $5.12M
    @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    President
    $6.31M
    @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $4.04M
    @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $770,656
    @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $267.24M
    @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $794.64M
    @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $764.01M
    @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $1.74M
    @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $428,562
    @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $291,620
    @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $705.46M
    @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
    ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $322.05M
    @ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $60.58M
    @ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $5.22M
    @ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $34.04M
    @ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
    BOSKIN MICHAEL J
    Director
    $5.30M
    @ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.32M
    @ $116.00 · 2024-05-03
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.90M
    @ $116.13 · 2024-05-01
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $346.77M
    @ $126.10 · 2024-03-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    KEY
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ORCL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    KEY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    ORCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View KEY Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis
    KeyCorp (KEY) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io