Compare StocksKEY vs MA

KeyCorp (KEY) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, KEY is undervalued at $23, with a DCF intrinsic value of $51 and a margin of safety of 56%. MA is fairly valued at $490, with an intrinsic value of $571 and a margin of safety of 14%. Of the two, KEY has the wider margin of safety.

KEY
KeyCorp
$22.59
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$489.79

Rewards

KEY
    MA
    • Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    KEY
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Share count has increased by 18% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.24 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    MA
    • High leverage (1.60x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 12 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    KEY
    MA
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.15B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    3.73%
    13.86
    Trailing P/E
    28.31
    10.51
    Forward P/E
    21.50
    Quality & Moat
    11.53%
    ROIC
    63.51%
    9.98%
    ROE
    232.08%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    100.00%
    1.74
    PEG Ratio
    1.54
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.60
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.50
    3.63%
    Dividend Yield
    0.69%
    KEY: 3Ties: 1MA: 4
    KEYMA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    KEY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    KEY
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-257.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.50B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MA
    $5.62
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $31.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$177.96B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    KEY
    56.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 56.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $22.59
    Fair Value: $51.43
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MA
    14.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 14.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $489.79
    Fair Value: $571.14
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    KEY

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $490?

    +13.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +12.0%

    The market implies +13.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +12.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    KEY
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MA
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    KEY
    -2.60
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MA
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    KEY
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 88.9%Retail & Other 10.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,225
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MA
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 8.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,804
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    KEY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    ALLARD JACQUELINE
    Director
    $2,525
    @ $14.03 · 2025-04-22
    TOBIN RICHARD J.
    Director
    $10,380
    @ $13.84 · 2025-04-21
    KHANNA SOMESH
    Director
    $1,387
    @ $13.87 · 2025-04-21
    RAMANI MOHIT
    Officer
    $137,500
    @ $13.75 · 2025-04-21
    BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $892,500
    @ $17.85 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    KEY
    2
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.77M
    GILE ELIZABETH R
    Director
    $499,992
    @ $20.88 · 2026-06-03
    MAGO ANGELA G
    Officer
    $494,411
    @ $21.66 · 2026-05-08
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $23.23 · 2026-02-06
    MAGO ANGELA G
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $21.55 · 2026-01-29
    EVANS KATRINA M.
    Officer
    $710,789
    @ $21.74 · 2026-01-22
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $867,143
    @ $19.29 · 2025-09-09
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $880,500
    @ $17.61 · 2025-08-08
    EVANS KATRINA M.
    Officer
    $317,390
    @ $18.67 · 2025-07-24
    GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.12M
    @ $18.86 · 2025-07-23
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $305,710
    @ $16.09 · 2025-06-12
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $83,000
    @ $16.60 · 2025-05-13
    KIDIK ALLYSON M
    Officer
    $17,973
    @ $17.69 · 2025-02-14
    GORMAN CHRISTOPHER M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $17.46 · 2025-02-13
    MAGO ANGELA G
    Officer
    $294,065
    @ $19.59 · 2024-11-06
    PAINE ANDREW J III
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $19.03 · 2024-11-06
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $154,260
    @ $17.14 · 2024-11-05
    BRADY AMY G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $719,692
    @ $16.92 · 2024-08-29
    HIGHSMITH CARLTON LEE
    Director
    $162,100
    @ $16.21 · 2024-08-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MA
    0
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $39.22M
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $4.48M
    @ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.20M
    @ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.46M
    @ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $178,049
    @ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $601,447
    @ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
    GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
    Director
    $173,910
    @ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $536,480
    @ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $508,474
    @ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
    SESHADRI RAJEEV
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
    KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
    Officer
    $549,373
    @ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $5.55M
    @ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $8.22M
    @ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $218,223
    @ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $257,535
    @ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.68M
    @ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $3.81M
    @ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $9.78M
    @ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.12M
    @ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $6.19M
    @ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
    MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
    MIEBACH MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.17M
    @ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $7.97M
    @ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.36M
    @ $500.44 · 2024-11-01
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $491.03 · 2024-09-27
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.29M
    @ $489.86 · 2024-09-20
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $550,000
    @ $500.00 · 2024-09-17
    MADABHUSHI VENKATA RAJAMANNAR
    Officer
    $2.31M
    @ $493.10 · 2024-09-13
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $528,000
    @ $480.00 · 2024-08-29
    MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $42.19M
    @ $468.80 · 2024-08-22
    MASTERCARD FOUNDATION ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $42.03M
    @ $467.02 · 2024-08-21
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.16M
    @ $470.00 · 2024-08-16
    SACHIN J. MEHRA
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.11M
    @ $455.00 · 2024-08-05
    LING HAI
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $465.46 · 2024-08-01
    ARKELL SANDRA A
    Officer
    $512,006
    @ $465.46 · 2024-08-01
    VOSBURG CRAIG
    Officer
    $4.07M
    @ $451.06 · 2024-06-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    KEY
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(70/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    KEY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
    MA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View KEY Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: KEY vs MA

    Is KeyCorp or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, KEY trades at a 56.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $51 vs. price $23), compared to MA's 14.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $571 vs. $490).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, KeyCorp or Mastercard Incorporated?

    MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while KEY scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is KeyCorp in financial distress?

    KEY's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, KeyCorp or Mastercard Incorporated?

    MA earns 63.5% ROIC versus KEY's 11.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, KeyCorp's or Mastercard Incorporated's?

    MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to KEY's 78/100 (Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    KEY vs MA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io