Compare StocksKDP vs PFE

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, KDP is overvalued at $32, with a DCF intrinsic value of $20 and a margin of safety of -60%. PFE is overvalued at $28, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$31.73
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.66

Rewards

KDP
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 10.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.98 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

KDP
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.36 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 15.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KDP
PFE
Valuation
$4.61B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
10.67%
FCF Yield
7.92%
32.06
Trailing P/E
36.39
12.52
Forward P/E
9.55
Quality & Moat
3.05%
ROIC
9.42%
5.10%
ROE
5.01%
50.96%
Gross Margin
74.72%
0.98
PEG Ratio
12.68
Balance Sheet Safety
0.95
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.66
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
2.89%
Dividend Yield
6.26%
KDP: 3Ties: 2PFE: 7
KDPPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KDP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KDP
$-5.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KDP
60.4% Overvalued
Price is 60.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $31.73
Fair Value: $19.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
23.3% Overvalued
Price is 23.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.66
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KDP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

+14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.9%

The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KDP
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KDP
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KDP
Insiders 5.0%Institutions 109.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,278
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KDP
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,247
ALT AARON E.
Director
$250,247
@ $31.83 · 2026-08-25
GORLI ERIC
Officer
$254,056
@ $27.69 · 2025-09-11
VAN DE VEN MICHAEL G
Director
$498,000
@ $33.20 · 2025-06-04
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$120.68M
@ $33.34 · 2025-01-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KDP
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.38M
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$778,200
@ $32.42 · 2026-09-09
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$310,650
@ $32.70 · 2026-09-03
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$295,200
@ $29.52 · 2025-12-12
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$272,952
@ $35.91 · 2025-08-20
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.84M
@ $32.90 · 2025-08-01
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.90M
@ $33.18 · 2025-07-29
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,920
@ $33.66 · 2025-07-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,726
@ $33.64 · 2025-07-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,680
@ $33.64 · 2025-06-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$395,040
@ $32.92 · 2025-06-03
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.88M
@ $33.10 · 2025-06-02
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$398,520
@ $33.21 · 2025-05-22
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$496,480
@ $34.24 · 2025-05-07
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$409,320
@ $34.11 · 2025-05-06
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$14.16M
@ $34.04 · 2025-05-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$427,080
@ $35.59 · 2025-04-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$417,360
@ $34.78 · 2025-04-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$400,680
@ $33.39 · 2025-03-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$408,600
@ $34.05 · 2025-03-04
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Officer and Director
$14.26M
@ $34.29 · 2025-03-04
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$251,150
@ $34.17 · 2025-03-03
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.25B
@ $32.65 · 2024-10-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KDP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KDP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View KDP Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: KDP vs PFE

Is Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -23.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $28), compared to KDP's -60.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $20 vs. $32).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

KDP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. in financial distress?

KDP's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) generates a 10.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 7.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?

PFE earns 9.4% ROIC versus KDP's 3.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.'s or Pfizer Inc.'s?

KDP's dividend earns a safety score of 54/100 (Borderline), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). KDP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

KDP vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io