Compare StocksKDP vs META

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, KDP is overvalued at $31, with a DCF intrinsic value of $23 and a margin of safety of -36%. META is fairly valued at $577, with an intrinsic value of $679 and a margin of safety of 15%. Of the two, META has the wider margin of safety.

KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$30.76
VS
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$577.22

Rewards

KDP
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
META
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 81.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

KDP
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.36 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 15.4% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
META
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Insiders have sold $6.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
KDP
META
Valuation
$-16.35B
Free Cash Flow
$46.11B
-39.06%
FCF Yield
3.15%
22.79
Trailing P/E
21.00
12.19
Forward P/E
15.93
Quality & Moat
4.07%
ROIC
20.87%
6.31%
ROE
32.93%
53.78%
Gross Margin
81.94%
1.07
PEG Ratio
0.87
Balance Sheet Safety
0.83
Net Debt / Equity
0.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.30
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.05
2.98%
Dividend Yield
0.35%
KDP: 2Ties: 1META: 9
KDPMETA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
KDP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

META

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
KDP
$-5.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.12B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
META
$8.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$151.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.36T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
KDP
36.3% Overvalued
Price is 36.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.76
Fair Value: $22.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
META
14.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 14.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $577.22
Fair Value: $678.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
KDP

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

META

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $577?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
KDP
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
META
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
KDP
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
META
-3.04
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
KDP
Insiders 5.0%Institutions 101.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,251
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
META
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 79.3%Retail & Other 20.6%
No. of Institutional Holders6,597
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
KDP
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $254,056
GORLI ERIC
Officer
$254,056
@ $27.69 · 2025-09-11
VAN DE VEN MICHAEL G
Director
$498,000
@ $33.20 · 2025-06-04
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$120.68M
@ $33.34 · 2025-01-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
META
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
KDP
0
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.52M
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$295,200
@ $29.52 · 2025-12-12
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$272,952
@ $35.91 · 2025-08-20
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.84M
@ $32.90 · 2025-08-01
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.90M
@ $33.18 · 2025-07-29
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,920
@ $33.66 · 2025-07-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,726
@ $33.64 · 2025-07-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$403,680
@ $33.64 · 2025-06-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$395,040
@ $32.92 · 2025-06-03
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$6.88M
@ $33.10 · 2025-06-02
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$398,520
@ $33.21 · 2025-05-22
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$496,480
@ $34.24 · 2025-05-07
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$409,320
@ $34.11 · 2025-05-06
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Director
$14.16M
@ $34.04 · 2025-05-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$427,080
@ $35.59 · 2025-04-17
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$417,360
@ $34.78 · 2025-04-01
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$400,680
@ $33.39 · 2025-03-20
DENOOYER MARY BETH
Officer
$408,600
@ $34.05 · 2025-03-04
GAMGORT ROBERT JAMES
Officer and Director
$14.26M
@ $34.29 · 2025-03-04
STEPHENS ANGELA A
Officer
$251,150
@ $34.17 · 2025-03-03
JAB BEVCO B.V.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.25B
@ $32.65 · 2024-10-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
META
4
Sells (3M)
63
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $58.33M
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$317,162
@ $629.29 · 2026-06-01
MAHONEY CURTIS J
Officer
$1.27M
@ $609.92 · 2026-05-27
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$4.77M
@ $607.83 · 2026-05-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$386,860
@ $667.00 · 2026-04-15
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$366,572
@ $632.02 · 2026-03-16
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$5.11M
@ $631.24 · 2026-02-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$370,724
@ $639.18 · 2026-02-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$342,869
@ $663.19 · 2026-02-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$369,448
@ $714.60 · 2026-02-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$343,805
@ $665.00 · 2026-01-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$314,517
@ $608.35 · 2026-01-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$358,602
@ $618.28 · 2026-01-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$337,601
@ $653.00 · 2026-01-12
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$336,262
@ $650.41 · 2026-01-05
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$341,860
@ $658.69 · 2025-12-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$340,258
@ $658.14 · 2025-12-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$342,218
@ $659.38 · 2025-12-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$341,794
@ $661.11 · 2025-12-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,836
@ $643.23 · 2025-12-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$374,680
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$333,982
@ $646.00 · 2025-12-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$344,699
@ $664.16 · 2025-12-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$346,199
@ $669.63 · 2025-12-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$333,312
@ $642.22 · 2025-12-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$330,379
@ $639.03 · 2025-12-01
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$323,929
@ $624.14 · 2025-11-25
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$309,445
@ $598.54 · 2025-11-24
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$307,040
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
ANDERSON AARON
Officer
$429,502
@ $591.60 · 2025-11-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$6.94M
@ $593.31 · 2025-11-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$365,610
@ $609.35 · 2025-11-17
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $608.60 · 2025-11-17
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$3.09M
@ $609.46 · 2025-11-14
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,596
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$326,227
@ $631.00 · 2025-11-10
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$325,932
@ $628.00 · 2025-11-04
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$339,152
@ $656.00 · 2025-11-03
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$390,807
@ $753.00 · 2025-10-28
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,528
@ $749.57 · 2025-10-27
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$382,176
@ $736.37 · 2025-10-21
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$372,912
@ $721.30 · 2025-10-20
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$333,391
@ $716.97 · 2025-10-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$367,374
@ $707.85 · 2025-10-14
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$368,797
@ $713.34 · 2025-10-13
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$372,113
@ $716.98 · 2025-10-07
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$364,387
@ $704.81 · 2025-10-06
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$384,838
@ $741.50 · 2025-09-30
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$387,088
@ $748.72 · 2025-09-29
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$399,215
@ $769.20 · 2025-09-23
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$403,948
@ $781.33 · 2025-09-22
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$398,156
@ $767.16 · 2025-09-16
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$352,224
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$391,612
@ $757.47 · 2025-09-15
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$393,142
@ $757.50 · 2025-09-09
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,671
@ $755.65 · 2025-09-08
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$376,924
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$375,471
@ $726.25 · 2025-09-02
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$389,494
@ $750.47 · 2025-08-26
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$390,392
@ $755.11 · 2025-08-25
NEWSTEAD JENNIFER
Officer
$402,225
@ $775.00 · 2025-08-18
OLIVAN JAVIER
Chief Operating Officer
$2.44M
@ $780.95 · 2025-08-18
BOSWORTH ANDREW
Chief Technology Officer
$13.02M
@ $777.15 · 2025-08-18
KIMMITT ROBERT M
Director
$364,709
@ $784.32 · 2025-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
KDP
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
META
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
KDP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
META
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View KDP Full AnalysisView META Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: KDP vs META

Is Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, META trades at a 14.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $679 vs. price $577), compared to KDP's -36.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $23 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

META scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while KDP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. in financial distress?

KDP's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. META scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) generates a 3.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.'s -39.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. or Meta Platforms, Inc.?

META earns 20.9% ROIC versus KDP's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.'s or Meta Platforms, Inc.'s?

META's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to KDP's 54/100 (Borderline). META has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.