Compare StocksJPM vs WELL

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Welltower Inc. (WELL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, JPM is undervalued at $325, with a DCF intrinsic value of $498 and a margin of safety of 35%. WELL is overvalued at $207, with an intrinsic value of $87 and a margin of safety of -138%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$325.22
VS
WELL
Welltower Inc.
$206.65

Rewards

JPM
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
WELL

    Risks

    JPM
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 15.6x is 25% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    WELL
    • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 3.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    JPM
    WELL
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.60B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.78%
    15.57
    Trailing P/E
    99.83
    13.80
    Forward P/E
    61.50
    Quality & Moat
    4.54%
    ROIC
    2.58%
    16.47%
    ROE
    3.67%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    39.87%
    1.76
    PEG Ratio
    3.66
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.34
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.11
    1.77%
    Dividend Yield
    1.39%
    JPM: 6Ties: 1WELL: 1
    JPMWELL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    JPM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    WELL
    No historical data available.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    JPM
    $3.95
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $120.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$475.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    WELL
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    JPM
    34.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 34.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $325.22
    Fair Value: $498.31
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    WELL
    138.4% Overvalued
    Price is 138.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $206.65
    Fair Value: $86.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    JPM

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    WELL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $207?

    +23.2%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    JPM
    90/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    WELL

    Insufficient data for Economic Moat Score calculation (requires 3+ years).

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    JPM
    -2.17
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    WELL

    Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    JPM
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.6%Retail & Other 24.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders6,275
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    WELL
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 102.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,074
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    JPM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    WELL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.03M
    GUNDLACH ANDREW
    Director
    $3.03M
    @ $151.46 · 2025-06-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    JPM
    15
    Sells (3M)
    29
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $95.82M
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $1.64M
    @ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.98M
    @ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $949,658
    @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $935,032
    @ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
    DIMON JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.00M
    @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $3.78M
    @ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $970,660
    @ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $127,761
    @ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $15.36M
    @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $132,684
    @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $886,157
    @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $627,207
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $904,890
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $640,295
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $301,311
    @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.83M
    @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.61M
    @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
    LAKE MARIANNE
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.57M
    @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.38M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.03M
    @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
    DIMON JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $31.50M
    @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $308,652
    @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $506,698
    @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $337,610
    @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $554,054
    @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $919,371
    @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $971,646
    @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    WELL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    BACON KENNETH J
    Director
    $286,418
    @ $130.19 · 2024-12-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    JPM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(69/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    WELL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    JPM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
    WELL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    View JPM Full AnalysisView WELL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: JPM vs WELL

    Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Welltower Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 34.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $498 vs. price $325), compared to WELL's -138.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $87 vs. $207).

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Welltower Inc.?

    JPM earns 4.5% ROIC versus WELL's 2.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.