Compare Stocks › JPM vs Q

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, JPM is undervalued at $337, with a DCF intrinsic value of $633 and a margin of safety of 47%. Q is undervalued at $117, with an intrinsic value of $153 and a margin of safety of 24%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$337.04
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$116.67

Rewards

JPM
  • ★JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
Q

    Risks

    JPM
    • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • ⚠31 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Q
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.16%
      14.14
      Trailing P/E
      41.67
      13.20
      Forward P/E
      21.22
      Quality & Moat
      4.84%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      18.01%
      ROE
      6.72%
      0.00%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      1.43
      PEG Ratio
      1.19
      Balance Sheet Safety
      N/A
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      1.96%
      Dividend Yield
      0.27%
      JPM: 4Ties: 1Q: 3
      JPMQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      JPM
      $3.95
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $120.20B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$475.31B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      JPM
      46.7% Margin of Safety
      Price is 46.7% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $337.04
      Fair Value: $632.73
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      18.3% Margin of Safety
      Price is 18.3% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $116.67
      Fair Value: $142.77
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

      +15.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.8%

      The market implies +15.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      JPM
      90/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      JPM
      -2.17
      Possible Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.6%Retail & Other 24.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders6,391
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 21.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,671
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      2
      Sells (3M)
      31
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $96.58M
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $882,026
      @ $352.81 · 2026-09-10
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $903,518
      @ $361.41 · 2026-08-11
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $1.81M
      @ $330.73 · 2026-06-22
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $1.64M
      @ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.70M
      @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.98M
      @ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $949,658
      @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $935,032
      @ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.26M
      @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.52M
      @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.72M
      @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.74M
      @ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $3.78M
      @ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $2.32M
      @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.80M
      @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
      DIMON JAMES
      Chief Executive Officer
      $40.00M
      @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $970,660
      @ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $127,761
      @ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $15.36M
      @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $132,684
      @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $886,157
      @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.76M
      @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.07M
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $627,207
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.79M
      @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.09M
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $2.30M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.68M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $904,890
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $640,295
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $301,311
      @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.83M
      @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.39M
      @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.61M
      @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
      LAKE MARIANNE
      Officer
      $3.28M
      @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.57M
      @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $2.71M
      @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $3.69M
      @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.37M
      @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $3.29M
      @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.54M
      @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $10.03M
      @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.38M
      @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
      DIMON JAMES
      Chief Executive Officer
      $31.50M
      @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $6.18M
      @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $308,652
      @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.06M
      @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $506,698
      @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $10.12M
      @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $337,610
      @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.15M
      @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $554,054
      @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.47M
      @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $971,646
      @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $919,371
      @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      JPM
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(61/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(39/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      JPM
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
      Q
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
      View JPM Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: JPM vs Q

      Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 46.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $633 vs. price $337), compared to Q's 23.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $153 vs. $117).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?▼

      JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?▼

      JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. Q scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?▼

      Q earns 7.6% ROIC versus JPM's 4.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?▼

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to JPM's 79/100 (Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.