Compare StocksJPM vs Q

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$287.97
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$111.94

Rewards

JPM
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Q

    Risks

    JPM
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Q
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $776.50M
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.31%
      14.39
      Trailing P/E
      33.92
      12.26
      Forward P/E
      25.33
      Quality & Moat
      5.32%
      ROIC
      6.45%
      N/A
      ROE
      9.39%
      0.00%
      Gross Margin
      46.17%
      N/A
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      N/A
      Debt / Equity
      0.61
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.58
      2.08%
      Dividend Yield
      0.13%
      JPM: 3Ties: 1Q: 2
      JPMQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      JPM
      $3.95
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $120.20B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$475.31B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      JPM
      46.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 46.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $287.97
      Fair Value: $538.22
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      17.4% Overvalued
      Price is 17.4% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $111.94
      Fair Value: $95.35
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

      +16.9%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.3%

      The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      JPM
      18/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      JPM
      -2.17
      Possible Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.0%Retail & Other 24.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders6,240
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,228
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      0
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $329,572
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      12
      Sells (3M)
      30
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $104.76M
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $132,684
      @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $15.36M
      @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $886,157
      @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $627,207
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.76M
      @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.07M
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.68M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $904,890
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $640,295
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.79M
      @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.09M
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $2.30M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $301,311
      @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.83M
      @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.39M
      @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.61M
      @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.57M
      @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
      LAKE MARIANNE
      Officer
      $3.28M
      @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $2.71M
      @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $3.69M
      @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.37M
      @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $3.29M
      @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.54M
      @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $10.03M
      @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.38M
      @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
      DIMON JAMES
      Chief Executive Officer
      $31.50M
      @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $308,652
      @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.06M
      @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $6.18M
      @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $506,698
      @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $337,610
      @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.15M
      @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $10.12M
      @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $554,054
      @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $919,371
      @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.47M
      @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $971,646
      @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $838,778
      @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.34M
      @ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.81M
      @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $886,565
      @ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $828,193
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      JPM
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(51/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      View JPM Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis