Compare StocksJPM vs Q

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$312.47
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$143.33

Rewards

JPM
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • PEG ratio of 0.87 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
Q

    Risks

    JPM
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 14 insider sales totaling $73.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.91 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    JPM
    Q
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $776.50M
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.58%
    14.95
    Trailing P/E
    43.43
    13.28
    Forward P/E
    32.66
    Quality & Moat
    4.54%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    N/A
    ROE
    9.39%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    46.17%
    0.87
    PEG Ratio
    2.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.58
    1.92%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    JPM: 4Ties: 1Q: 2
    JPMQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    JPM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    JPM
    $3.95
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $120.20B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$475.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    JPM
    37.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 37.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $312.47
    Fair Value: $497.67
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    54.9% Overvalued
    Price is 54.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $143.33
    Fair Value: $92.54
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    JPM

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

    +19.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +19.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    JPM
    90/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    JPM
    -2.17
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    JPM
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders6,190
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 25.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,353
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    JPM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    JPM
    14
    Sells (3M)
    33
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $118.67M
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $970,660
    @ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
    DIMON JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.00M
    @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $3.78M
    @ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $127,761
    @ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $132,684
    @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $15.36M
    @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $886,157
    @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $627,207
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.68M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $904,890
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $640,295
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $301,311
    @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.83M
    @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.61M
    @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
    LAKE MARIANNE
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.57M
    @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
    BARNUM JEREMY
    Chief Financial Officer
    $10.03M
    @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
    BAMMANN LINDA B.
    Director
    $2.38M
    @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
    DIMON JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $31.50M
    @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $308,652
    @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $6.18M
    @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $506,698
    @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
    LEOPOLD ROBIN
    Officer
    $337,610
    @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
    PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
    ROHRBAUGH TROY L
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
    BEER LORI A
    Chief Technology Officer
    $554,054
    @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $919,371
    @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $971,646
    @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
    FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
    General Counsel
    $838,778
    @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
    BACON ASHLEY
    Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
    ERDOES MARY E.
    Officer
    $1.34M
    @ $253.97 · 2025-01-16
    PETNO DOUGLAS B
    Officer
    $886,565
    @ $253.96 · 2025-01-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $828,193
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    JPM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    JPM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View JPM Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis
    JPM vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io