Compare StocksJPM vs MDLZ

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, JPM is undervalued at $325, with a DCF intrinsic value of $498 and a margin of safety of 35%. MDLZ is overvalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $35 and a margin of safety of -71%. Of the two, JPM has the wider margin of safety.

JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
$325.22
VS
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$60.12

Rewards

JPM
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.79 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
MDLZ

    Risks

    JPM
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Trailing P/E of 15.6x is 25% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.30 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    MDLZ

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      JPM
      MDLZ
      Valuation
      N/A
      Free Cash Flow
      $2.85B
      N/A
      FCF Yield
      3.69%
      15.57
      Trailing P/E
      29.76
      13.80
      Forward P/E
      17.75
      Quality & Moat
      4.54%
      ROIC
      6.09%
      16.47%
      ROE
      10.16%
      0.00%
      Gross Margin
      28.77%
      1.76
      PEG Ratio
      1.02
      Balance Sheet Safety
      N/A
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.78
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      N/A
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      3.85
      1.77%
      Dividend Yield
      3.22%
      JPM: 3Ties: 1MDLZ: 4
      JPMMDLZ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      MDLZ

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      JPM
      $3.95
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $120.20B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$475.31B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      MDLZ
      $-4.39
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $5.03B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-22.05B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      JPM
      34.7% Margin of Safety
      Price is 34.7% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $325.22
      Fair Value: $498.31
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      MDLZ
      71.1% Overvalued
      Price is 71.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $60.12
      Fair Value: $35.15
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      JPM

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      MDLZ

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

      +16.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      JPM
      90/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      MDLZ
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      JPM
      -2.17
      Possible Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      MDLZ
      -2.43
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Insiders 0.4%Institutions 75.6%Retail & Other 24.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders6,275
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      MDLZ
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.1%Retail & Other 9.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,492
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      MDLZ
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      JPM
      15
      Sells (3M)
      29
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $95.82M
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $1.64M
      @ $300.27 · 2026-05-20
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.98M
      @ $298.36 · 2026-05-15
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.70M
      @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $949,658
      @ $300.05 · 2026-05-15
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.52M
      @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $935,032
      @ $309.41 · 2026-05-05
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.26M
      @ $309.42 · 2026-05-05
      DIMON JAMES
      Chief Executive Officer
      $40.00M
      @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.80M
      @ $306.56 · 2026-04-15
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.72M
      @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $2.32M
      @ $306.55 · 2026-04-15
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $3.78M
      @ $306.57 · 2026-04-15
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.74M
      @ $306.58 · 2026-04-15
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $970,660
      @ $306.59 · 2026-04-15
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $127,761
      @ $295.06 · 2026-03-23
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $15.36M
      @ $307.11 · 2026-02-19
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $132,684
      @ $307.14 · 2026-02-19
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $886,157
      @ $306.42 · 2026-02-17
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.76M
      @ $306.41 · 2026-02-17
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.07M
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $627,207
      @ $306.40 · 2026-02-17
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $904,890
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.68M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $2.30M
      @ $312.79 · 2026-01-16
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.79M
      @ $312.78 · 2026-01-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $1.09M
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $640,295
      @ $312.80 · 2026-01-16
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $301,311
      @ $311.92 · 2025-11-07
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.83M
      @ $297.94 · 2025-09-02
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.39M
      @ $267.44 · 2025-06-12
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.61M
      @ $262.47 · 2025-06-05
      LAKE MARIANNE
      Officer
      $3.28M
      @ $267.08 · 2025-05-16
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.57M
      @ $267.09 · 2025-05-16
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $2.71M
      @ $266.89 · 2025-05-15
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.37M
      @ $262.53 · 2025-05-13
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $3.69M
      @ $262.54 · 2025-05-13
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $3.29M
      @ $263.08 · 2025-05-12
      BAMMANN LINDA B.
      Director
      $2.38M
      @ $250.00 · 2025-05-06
      BARNUM JEREMY
      Chief Financial Officer
      $10.03M
      @ $250.77 · 2025-05-06
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.54M
      @ $250.76 · 2025-05-06
      DIMON JAMES
      Chief Executive Officer
      $31.50M
      @ $235.68 · 2025-04-14
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $6.18M
      @ $247.02 · 2025-03-24
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.06M
      @ $247.03 · 2025-03-24
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $308,652
      @ $246.92 · 2025-03-24
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $506,698
      @ $246.93 · 2025-03-24
      ROHRBAUGH TROY L
      Officer
      $10.12M
      @ $269.84 · 2025-02-20
      PIEPSZAK JENNIFER A
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.15M
      @ $269.85 · 2025-02-20
      LEOPOLD ROBIN
      Officer
      $337,610
      @ $270.09 · 2025-02-20
      BEER LORI A
      Chief Technology Officer
      $554,054
      @ $269.88 · 2025-02-20
      FRIEDMAN STACEY R.
      General Counsel
      $919,371
      @ $278.34 · 2025-02-18
      ERDOES MARY E.
      Officer
      $1.47M
      @ $278.37 · 2025-02-18
      PETNO DOUGLAS B
      Officer
      $971,646
      @ $278.41 · 2025-02-18
      BACON ASHLEY
      Officer
      $1.81M
      @ $253.94 · 2025-01-16
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      MDLZ
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $186,000
      VALLE GUSTAVO CARLOS
      Officer
      $186,000
      @ $62.00 · 2026-02-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      JPM
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(69/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      MDLZ
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(47/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      JPM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
      MDLZ
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
      View JPM Full AnalysisView MDLZ Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: JPM vs MDLZ

      Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Mondelez International, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, JPM trades at a 34.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $498 vs. price $325), compared to MDLZ's -71.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $35 vs. $60).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Mondelez International, Inc.?

      JPM scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while MDLZ scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is JPMorgan Chase & Co. in financial distress?

      JPM's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDLZ scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, JPMorgan Chase & Co. or Mondelez International, Inc.?

      MDLZ earns 6.1% ROIC versus JPM's 4.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s or Mondelez International, Inc.'s?

      JPM's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to MDLZ's 39/100 (Unsafe). JPM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.