Compare StocksJNJ vs PAYC

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) vs Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, JNJ is fairly valued at $256, with a DCF intrinsic value of $283 and a margin of safety of 9%. PAYC is undervalued at $164, with an intrinsic value of $262 and a margin of safety of 37%. Of the two, PAYC has the wider margin of safety.

JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$256.35
VS
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
$163.96

Rewards

JNJ
  • Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
PAYC
  • Paycom Software, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Paycom Software, Inc. scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

JNJ
  • FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 29.8x is 49% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 4.23 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
PAYC
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
JNJ
PAYC
Valuation
$16.89B
Free Cash Flow
$403.50M
2.73%
FCF Yield
5.28%
29.77
Trailing P/E
18.98
20.07
Forward P/E
13.36
Quality & Moat
16.85%
ROIC
38.58%
25.74%
ROE
37.15%
68.14%
Gross Margin
87.60%
4.23
PEG Ratio
1.18
Balance Sheet Safety
0.33
Net Debt / Equity
0.75
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.91
2.09%
Dividend Yield
0.91%
JNJ: 4Ties: 1PAYC: 7
JNJPAYC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PAYC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PAYC
$-8.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.06B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.22B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
JNJ
9.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 9.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $256.35
Fair Value: $282.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PAYC
37.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 37.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $163.96
Fair Value: $262.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $256?

+9.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.5%

The market implies +9.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PAYC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $164?

+6.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +6.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PAYC
87/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PAYC
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
JNJ
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 76.8%Retail & Other 23.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,754
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PAYC
Insiders 13.8%Institutions 101.4%
No. of Institutional Holders832
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PAYC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
2
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $106.31M
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$5.79M
@ $251.27 · 2026-07-20
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$930,113
@ $165.06 · 2024-08-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PAYC
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $926,249
PECK RANDALL
Chief Operating Officer
$351,250
@ $140.50 · 2026-05-18
FOSTER ROBERT D
Chief Financial Officer
$211,458
@ $162.66 · 2025-12-10
PECK RANDALL
Chief Operating Officer
$363,541
@ $165.85 · 2025-12-05
PECK RANDALL
Chief Operating Officer
$234,261
@ $263.21 · 2025-06-04
WATTS JULIUS C JR.
Director
$109,108
@ $218.22 · 2025-02-24
PECK RANDALL
Chief Operating Officer
$763,866
@ $212.19 · 2025-02-21
PETERS FREDERICK C II
Director
$315,855
@ $210.57 · 2025-02-18
RICHISON CHAD R
Chief Executive Officer
$414,154
@ $212.39 · 2024-10-31
BOELTE CRAIG E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.85M
@ $155.98 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PAYC
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
JNJ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
PAYC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View JNJ Full AnalysisView PAYC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: JNJ vs PAYC

Is Johnson & Johnson or Paycom Software, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PAYC trades at a 37.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $262 vs. price $164), compared to JNJ's 9.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $283 vs. $256).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Johnson & Johnson or Paycom Software, Inc.?

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while PAYC scores 87/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Paycom Software, Inc. in financial distress?

PAYC's Altman Z-Score of 1.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JNJ scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Johnson & Johnson or Paycom Software, Inc.?

Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Johnson & Johnson's 2.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Johnson & Johnson or Paycom Software, Inc.?

PAYC earns 38.6% ROIC versus JNJ's 16.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Johnson & Johnson's or Paycom Software, Inc.'s?

PAYC's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to JNJ's 79/100 (Safe). PAYC has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

JNJ vs PAYC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io