Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
As of 2026-08-03, JNJ is fairly valued at $256, with a DCF intrinsic value of $283 and a margin of safety of 9%. MPWR is overvalued at $1426, with an intrinsic value of $725 and a margin of safety of -97%. Of the two, JNJ has the wider margin of safety.
Rewards
- ★Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
- ★Gross margin of 68.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
- ★Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
- ★Free cash flow has grown at a 52.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
- ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.06 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
Risks
- ⚠FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 29.8x is 49% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
- ⚠PEG ratio of 4.23 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
- ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 3 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
- ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
- ⚠Trailing P/E of 87.0x is 79% above the historical average of 48.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
Key Valuation Metrics
Learn more →Historical Fundamentals
Learn more →Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.
$1 Retained Earnings Test
Learn more →> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis
Learn more →Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth
Learn more →What growth rate is the market pricing in at $256?
The market implies +9.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.
Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.
Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.
Economic Moat Score
Learn more →Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.
Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.
Forensic Accounting
Learn more →M-Score Trend
M-Score Trend
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
Ownership Breakdown
Learn more →High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
Insider Buying Activity
Learn more →Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.
Insider Selling Activity
Learn more →Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.
🎭 Mr. Market's Mood
Learn more →"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"
"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"
Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
⚖️ Buffett Signal
Learn more →The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.
Frequently Asked Questions: JNJ vs MPWR
Is Johnson & Johnson or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼
Based on our discounted cash flow model, JNJ trades at a 9.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $283 vs. price $256), compared to MPWR's -96.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $725 vs. $1426).
Which stock has a wider economic moat, Johnson & Johnson or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?▼
JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while MPWR scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.
Which dividend is safer, Johnson & Johnson's or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s?▼
MPWR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to JNJ's 79/100 (Safe). MPWR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.