Compare StocksJNJ vs LW

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, JNJ is fairly valued at $228, with a DCF intrinsic value of $281 and a margin of safety of 19%. LW is overvalued at $45, with an intrinsic value of $24 and a margin of safety of -89%. Of the two, JNJ has the wider margin of safety.

JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$228.39
VS
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$45.06

Rewards

JNJ
  • Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
LW
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 21.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.11 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

JNJ
  • Trailing P/E of 26.5x is 33% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 3.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
LW
  • Gross margin of 20.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (2.17x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
JNJ
LW
Valuation
$19.31B
Free Cash Flow
$596.99M
3.51%
FCF Yield
9.60%
26.46
Trailing P/E
21.15
17.96
Forward P/E
15.00
Quality & Moat
15.32%
ROIC
9.62%
26.42%
ROE
17.36%
68.04%
Gross Margin
20.66%
3.06
PEG Ratio
1.02
Balance Sheet Safety
0.41
Net Debt / Equity
2.17
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.96
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.40
2.22%
Dividend Yield
3.38%
JNJ: 6Ties: 1LW: 5
JNJLW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LW
$-4.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.56B
Δ Market Cap
$-7.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
JNJ
18.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $228.39
Fair Value: $280.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LW
89.0% Overvalued
Price is 89.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $45.06
Fair Value: $23.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $228?

+7.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.3%

The market implies +7.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

LW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $45?

+12.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.5%

The market implies +12.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +5.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
LW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LW
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
JNJ
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.9%Retail & Other 23.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,728
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LW
Insiders 3.1%Institutions 98.5%
No. of Institutional Holders777
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LW
6
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $16.98M
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$409,225
@ $40.92 · 2026-05-11
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$199,781
@ $43.85 · 2026-04-27
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$6.37M
@ $42.48 · 2026-04-15
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$9.70M
@ $41.11 · 2026-04-08
PRESTAGE NORMAN
Director
$103,500
@ $41.40 · 2026-04-07
BENSEN PETER J
Director
$197,225
@ $39.45 · 2026-04-06
NIBLOCK ROBERT A
Director
$182,819
@ $60.94 · 2025-01-13
JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
Director
$316,350
@ $63.27 · 2024-12-23
BLIXT CHARLES A
Director
$75,901
@ $63.25 · 2024-12-23
JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
Director
$554,291
@ $55.43 · 2024-07-26
NIBLOCK ROBERT A
Director
$277,476
@ $55.50 · 2024-07-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $103.65M
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$930,113
@ $165.06 · 2024-08-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LW
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $99,973
JONES GREGORY W
Officer
$99,973
@ $62.48 · 2025-10-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
JNJ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
LW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View JNJ Full AnalysisView LW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: JNJ vs LW

Is Johnson & Johnson or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JNJ trades at a 18.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $281 vs. price $228), compared to LW's -89.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $24 vs. $45).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Johnson & Johnson or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while LW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. in financial distress?

LW's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JNJ scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Johnson & Johnson or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) generates a 9.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Johnson & Johnson's 3.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Johnson & Johnson or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

JNJ earns 15.3% ROIC versus LW's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Johnson & Johnson's or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s?

JNJ's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to LW's 54/100 (Borderline). JNJ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.