Compare StocksJNJ vs LULU

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU)

JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$224.20
VS
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
$128.98

Rewards

JNJ
  • Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 68.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
LULU
  • lululemon athletica inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • lululemon athletica inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

JNJ
  • Trailing P/E of 26.3x is 32% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.95 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $58.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
LULU
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
JNJ
LULU
Valuation
$19.31B
Free Cash Flow
$824.08M
3.58%
FCF Yield
5.45%
26.31
Trailing P/E
9.73
17.64
Forward P/E
9.74
Quality & Moat
15.32%
ROIC
28.95%
33.02%
ROE
31.83%
68.04%
Gross Margin
56.60%
2.95
PEG Ratio
0.64
Balance Sheet Safety
0.68
Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.96
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.00
2.36%
Dividend Yield
N/A
JNJ: 2Ties: 2LULU: 7
JNJLULU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

LULU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LULU
$-10.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$4.94B
Δ Market Cap
$-50.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
JNJ
12.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 12.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $224.20
Fair Value: $256.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LULU
55.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 55.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $128.98
Fair Value: $287.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $224?

+8.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.1%

The market implies +8.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +13.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

LULU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $129?

-2.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.5%

The market implies -2.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
LULU
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LULU
-1.92
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
JNJ
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.2%Retail & Other 23.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,579
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LULU
Insiders 4.7%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 16.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,417
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LULU
2
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.49M
MAESTRINI ANDRE
Chief Executive Officer
$494,590
@ $151.02 · 2026-04-01
BERGH CHARLES V
Director
$999,978
@ $164.20 · 2026-03-20
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $260.00 · 2024-09-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
JNJ
7
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $101.23M
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$930,113
@ $165.06 · 2024-08-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LULU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.90M
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$100,142
@ $161.00 · 2026-04-08
FRANK MEGHAN
Chief Financial Officer
$561,821
@ $211.37 · 2025-12-30
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$2.76M
@ $204.00 · 2025-12-16
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$109,470
@ $178.00 · 2025-09-30
MCDONALD CALVIN
Chief Executive Officer
$6.38M
@ $235.69 · 2025-06-27
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$782,735
@ $387.11 · 2024-12-26
BURGOYNE CELESTE
Officer
$10.09M
@ $405.54 · 2024-12-09
NEUBURGER NICOLE
Officer
$131,021
@ $269.59 · 2024-09-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
JNJ
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LULU
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
JNJ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
LULU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
View JNJ Full AnalysisView LULU Full Analysis
JNJ vs LULU: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io