Compare Stocks › JBL vs PFE

Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, JBL is undervalued at $273, with a DCF intrinsic value of $598 and a margin of safety of 54%. PFE is overvalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. Of the two, JBL has the wider margin of safety.

JBL
Jabil Inc.
$272.72
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52

Rewards

JBL
  • ★Jabil Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Jabil Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 25.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

JBL
  • ⚠Gross margin of 9.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠High leverage (1.61x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
JBL
PFE
Valuation
$1.28B
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
4.57%
FCF Yield
7.18%
27.97
Trailing P/E
40.16
12.30
Forward P/E
10.57
Quality & Moat
27.72%
ROIC
9.42%
66.37%
ROE
5.01%
9.23%
Gross Margin
74.72%
0.82
PEG Ratio
13.98
Balance Sheet Safety
1.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
0.12%
Dividend Yield
5.64%
JBL: 5Ties: 1PFE: 6
JBLPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
JBL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
JBL
$3.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.97B
Δ Market Cap
+$11.77B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
JBL
54.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 54.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $272.72
Fair Value: $598.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
JBL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $273?

+12.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.1%

The market implies +12.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
JBL
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
JBL
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
JBL
Insiders 1.3%Institutions 101.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,521
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
JBL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $149,815
TYAGARAJAN NALLICHERI VYDIANATHAN
Director
$149,815
@ $299.63 · 2026-07-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
JBL
1
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $61.31M
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$277,161
@ $277.16 · 2026-10-20
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$319,857
@ $319.86 · 2026-07-15
CROWLEY MATTHEW
Officer
$32,430
@ $345.00 · 2026-07-06
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$340,000
@ $340.00 · 2026-04-30
PRIESTLEY ANDREW
Chief Operating Officer
$1.05M
@ $330.00 · 2026-04-20
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$1.63M
@ $317.51 · 2026-04-17
YAP MAY YEE
Chief Technology Officer
$501,221
@ $306.74 · 2026-04-16
RENNO RAFAEL
Officer
$305,000
@ $305.00 · 2026-04-13
BERRY ADAM E
Officer
$477,450
@ $301.23 · 2026-04-10
PRIESTLEY ANDREW
Chief Operating Officer
$1.20M
@ $301.00 · 2026-04-10
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$600,000
@ $300.00 · 2026-04-10
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$2.06M
@ $295.00 · 2026-04-09
RENNO RAFAEL
Officer
$288,000
@ $288.00 · 2026-04-08
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$2.03M
@ $290.00 · 2026-04-08
DASTOOR MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$2.71M
@ $286.64 · 2026-04-08
BERRY ADAM E
Officer
$272,796
@ $272.80 · 2026-04-01
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$278,332
@ $278.33 · 2026-03-24
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$270,000
@ $270.00 · 2026-03-24
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$102,872
@ $243.77 · 2026-02-02
DASTOOR MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$3.70M
@ $246.91 · 2026-01-22
BERRY ADAM E
Officer
$404,113
@ $253.20 · 2026-01-16
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.30M
@ $250.00 · 2026-01-16
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$246,000
@ $246.00 · 2026-01-15
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$5.52M
@ $241.90 · 2026-01-15
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.72M
@ $236.25 · 2026-01-02
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$2.35M
@ $235.00 · 2025-12-23
MCCOY FREDERIC E III
Officer
$4.95M
@ $224.93 · 2025-12-19
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$337,500
@ $225.00 · 2025-12-19
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$11.27M
@ $225.32 · 2025-12-19
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.24M
@ $212.20 · 2025-12-01
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$99,971
@ $220.69 · 2025-11-03
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.42M
@ $220.83 · 2025-11-03
YAP MAY YEE
Chief Technology Officer
$1.99M
@ $225.03 · 2025-10-31
MCKAY FRANCIS
Officer
$566,999
@ $224.47 · 2025-10-29
HEBARD GREGORY B
Chief Financial Officer
$1.30M
@ $213.54 · 2025-10-28
CROWLEY MATTHEW
Officer
$153,830
@ $211.60 · 2025-10-27
MELACHRINO KRISTINE
General Counsel
$1.40M
@ $213.40 · 2025-10-24
CROWLEY MATTHEW
Officer
$1.34M
@ $205.73 · 2025-10-21
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$8.31M
@ $207.77 · 2025-10-17
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.30M
@ $214.84 · 2025-10-01
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.00M
@ $200.02 · 2025-09-02
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$98,196
@ $219.19 · 2025-08-01
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.38M
@ $219.20 · 2025-08-01
MCCOY FREDERIC E III
Officer
$1.01M
@ $223.55 · 2025-07-23
PRIESTLEY ANDREW
Officer
$832,965
@ $225.00 · 2025-07-23
PRIESTLEY ANDREW
Officer
$850,950
@ $225.00 · 2025-07-21
RAYMUND STEVEN A
Director
$3.00M
@ $223.11 · 2025-07-21
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$222,750
@ $222.75 · 2025-07-03
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$4.33M
@ $216.59 · 2025-07-01
RAYMUND STEVEN A
Director
$3.46M
@ $216.83 · 2025-06-27
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$518,934
@ $207.57 · 2025-06-20
BERRY ADAM E
Officer
$848,113
@ $200.36 · 2025-06-18
MCKAY FRANCIS
Officer
$697,621
@ $205.48 · 2025-06-18
MCCOY FREDERIC E III
Officer
$1.84M
@ $205.39 · 2025-06-18
PRIESTLEY ANDREW
Officer
$2.83M
@ $203.17 · 2025-06-18
YAP MAY YEE
Chief Technology Officer
$1.40M
@ $206.00 · 2025-06-18
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$4.49M
@ $200.01 · 2025-06-18
DASTOOR MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$3.49M
@ $191.66 · 2025-06-17
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$29.00M
@ $193.33 · 2025-06-17
MONDELLO MARK T
Officer and Director
$3.34M
@ $166.75 · 2025-06-02
DASTOOR MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.70M
@ $169.90 · 2025-05-14
SCHICK GARY K.
Officer
$102,549
@ $151.25 · 2025-05-02
CROWLEY MATTHEW
Officer
$17,214
@ $149.69 · 2025-05-01
HOLLAND CHRISTOPHER S
Director
$551,728
@ $162.27 · 2025-01-31
PLANT JOHN C
Director
$8.63M
@ $172.55 · 2025-01-24
RAYMUND STEVEN A
Director
$3.03M
@ $151.30 · 2025-01-10
ANSARI ANOUSHEH
Director
$155,000
@ $155.00 · 2025-01-07
MCCOY FREDERIC E III
Officer
$599,240
@ $149.81 · 2025-01-03
YAP MAY YEE
Chief Technology Officer
$501,751
@ $150.45 · 2025-01-03
BORGES STEVEN D
Officer
$752,500
@ $150.50 · 2025-01-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
JBL
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
JBL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View JBL Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: JBL vs PFE

Is Jabil Inc. or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JBL trades at a 54.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $598 vs. price $273), compared to PFE's -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Jabil Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

JBL scores 83/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JBL scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Jabil Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Jabil Inc.'s 4.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Jabil Inc. or Pfizer Inc.?▼

JBL earns 27.7% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Jabil Inc.'s or Pfizer Inc.'s?▼

JBL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). JBL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

JBL vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io