Compare StocksIVZ vs TXN

Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, IVZ is undervalued at $28, with a DCF intrinsic value of $104 and a margin of safety of 73%. TXN is overvalued at $323, with an intrinsic value of $283 and a margin of safety of -14%. Of the two, IVZ has the wider margin of safety.

IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
$28.14
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$322.86

Rewards

IVZ
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • FCF yield of 11.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.38 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
TXN
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Altman Z-Score of 8.73 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

IVZ
  • ROIC has declined by 6.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.39 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
TXN
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 55.3x is 104% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IVZ
TXN
Valuation
$1.44B
Free Cash Flow
$2.60B
11.55%
FCF Yield
0.89%
N/A
Trailing P/E
55.28
9.42
Forward P/E
34.27
Quality & Moat
6.53%
ROIC
17.87%
-1.54%
ROE
32.35%
28.92%
Gross Margin
57.32%
0.38
PEG Ratio
1.46
Balance Sheet Safety
0.09
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.87
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.03
2.94%
Dividend Yield
1.84%
IVZ: 6Ties: 1TXN: 4
IVZTXN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IVZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TXN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IVZ
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-1.39B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.48B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TXN
$3.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IVZ
73.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 73.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $28.14
Fair Value: $104.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TXN
31.8% Overvalued
Price is 31.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $322.86
Fair Value: $245.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IVZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

-2.6%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

TXN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $323?

+22.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +32.1%

The market implies +22.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +32.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IVZ
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TXN
48/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IVZ

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

TXN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IVZ
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.1%
No. of Institutional Holders871
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TXN
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 92.6%Retail & Other 7.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,235
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IVZ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TXN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IVZ
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.05M
SHARP DOUGLAS J
Officer
$3.77M
@ $23.56 · 2025-10-31
BUTCHER STEPHANIE
Officer
$2.28M
@ $22.12 · 2025-09-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TXN
18
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $113.32M
CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
Director
$3.20M
@ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$14.71M
@ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.55M
@ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
COX CARRIE SMITH
Director
$2.71M
@ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$1.47M
@ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.61M
@ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
KNECHT JULIE C.
Officer
$2.77M
@ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.82M
@ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$7.87M
@ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$13.82M
@ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
KANE KATHARINE
General Counsel
$1.66M
@ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$982,359
@ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$5.00M
@ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$998,771
@ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$5.06M
@ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
BLUEDORN TODD M
Director
$1.18M
@ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.19M
@ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$11.12M
@ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
KOZANIAN HAGOP H
Officer
$1.55M
@ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
GARY MARK
Officer
$5.24M
@ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$15.88M
@ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$1.50M
@ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$986,604
@ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
BLINN MARK A
Director
$696,647
@ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$670,387
@ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
KIRK RONALD
Director
$1.62M
@ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$164,306
@ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$308,030
@ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$19.85M
@ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$38.65M
@ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
CLARK JANET F
Director
$1.23M
@ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
TEMPLETON RICHARD K
Chairman of the Board
$39.32M
@ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
BLINN MARK A
Director
$1.17M
@ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
LEONARD SHANON J
Officer
$401,241
@ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
BLINN MARK A
Director
$106,617
@ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
KIRK RONALD
Director
$2.14M
@ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.49M
@ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$2.88M
@ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$1.81M
@ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
LIZARDI RAFAEL R
Chief Financial Officer
$10.19M
@ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$472,514
@ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
GARY MARK
Officer
$940,296
@ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
Officer
$27,941
@ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$5.29M
@ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
SANCHEZ ROBERT E
Director
$2.09M
@ $208.80 · 2024-10-25
RON AMICHAI
Officer
$2.76M
@ $213.72 · 2024-08-29
GARY MARK
Officer
$3.22M
@ $212.63 · 2024-08-29
ROBERTS MARK T
Officer
$1.00M
@ $213.08 · 2024-08-29
PATSLEY PAMELA H
Director
$1.29M
@ $212.43 · 2024-08-29
BAHAI AHMAD
Officer
$892,427
@ $209.98 · 2024-08-27
YUNUS MOHAMMAD
Officer
$789,215
@ $208.90 · 2024-08-26
ILAN HAVIV
Chief Executive Officer
$251,324
@ $209.44 · 2024-08-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IVZ
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TXN
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IVZ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
TXN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View IVZ Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IVZ vs TXN

Is Invesco Ltd. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, IVZ trades at a 73.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $104 vs. price $28), compared to TXN's -13.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $283 vs. $323).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Invesco Ltd. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while IVZ scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Invesco Ltd. in financial distress?

IVZ's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TXN scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Invesco Ltd. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) generates a 11.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Invesco Ltd. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

TXN earns 17.9% ROIC versus IVZ's 6.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Invesco Ltd.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?

IVZ's dividend earns a safety score of 65/100 (Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). IVZ has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

IVZ vs TXN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io