Compare StocksIT vs PFE

Gartner, Inc. (IT) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, IT is undervalued at $151, with a DCF intrinsic value of $307 and a margin of safety of 51%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

IT
Gartner, Inc.
$151.02
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

IT
  • Gartner, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 69.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Gartner, Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

IT
  • High leverage (26.63x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IT
PFE
Valuation
$1.06B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
10.53%
FCF Yield
N/A
14.92
Trailing P/E
19.09
9.87
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
30.67%
ROIC
10.19%
94.88%
ROE
8.31%
68.99%
Gross Margin
74.80%
0.66
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
26.63
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.26
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
0.00%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
IT: 5Ties: 1PFE: 5
ITPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IT
$-3.05
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.87B
Δ Market Cap
$-8.74B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IT
50.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.02
Fair Value: $306.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $151?

+3.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.4%

The market implies +3.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies -0.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IT
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IT
-2.91
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IT
Insiders 3.5%Institutions 118.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,011
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IT
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.05M
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$7,706
@ $154.12 · 2026-02-05
PAGLIUCA STEPHEN G
Director
$9.94M
@ $229.57 · 2025-12-10
GUTIERREZ JOSE M.
Director
$99,997
@ $239.80 · 2025-08-18
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IT
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $161,708
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$84,983
@ $231.56 · 2025-12-03
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$50,505
@ $229.57 · 2025-12-03
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$26,220
@ $249.71 · 2025-08-22
FUCHS ANNE SUTHERLAND
Director
$270,705
@ $413.29 · 2025-06-12
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$792,439
@ $421.51 · 2025-06-09
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$2.42M
@ $448.78 · 2025-05-21
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$281,250
@ $450.00 · 2025-05-19
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$84,068
@ $447.17 · 2025-05-16
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$11,250
@ $450.00 · 2025-05-15
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$1.54M
@ $450.17 · 2025-05-13
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$241,610
@ $449.09 · 2025-05-13
KRANICH ROBIN B.
Officer
$322,574
@ $436.50 · 2025-05-07
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$47,562
@ $436.35 · 2025-05-07
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$44,387
@ $493.19 · 2025-02-27
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$881,258
@ $506.47 · 2025-02-26
SERRA EILEEN
Director
$587,724
@ $489.77 · 2025-02-24
RINELLO JOHN J
Officer
$47,746
@ $530.51 · 2025-02-10
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$89,931
@ $519.83 · 2024-12-11
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$98,949
@ $523.54 · 2024-12-06
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$214,229
@ $521.24 · 2024-11-27
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$2.62M
@ $524.02 · 2024-11-26
BISSON PETER E
Director
$921,367
@ $528.61 · 2024-11-15
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$6.98M
@ $552.79 · 2024-11-13
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$888,000
@ $555.00 · 2024-11-13
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$165,652
@ $554.02 · 2024-11-13
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$12.47M
@ $548.48 · 2024-11-12
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$550,340
@ $550.34 · 2024-11-12
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $550.81 · 2024-11-11
BECK JOSEPH P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $553.34 · 2024-11-11
ALLARD KENNETH
Officer
$880,952
@ $548.88 · 2024-11-11
SRIBAR VALENTIN T
Officer
$475,580
@ $553.00 · 2024-11-11
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$1.09M
@ $546.80 · 2024-11-08
HALL EUGENE A.
Chief Executive Officer
$9.99M
@ $546.24 · 2024-11-08
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$121,878
@ $549.00 · 2024-11-08
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$7.76M
@ $537.20 · 2024-11-07
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$793,530
@ $529.02 · 2024-11-06
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$241,873
@ $506.01 · 2024-09-13
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$3.95M
@ $501.72 · 2024-09-12
HALL EUGENE A.
Chief Executive Officer
$17.21M
@ $505.40 · 2024-09-12
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$1.06M
@ $500.15 · 2024-09-10
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$246,000
@ $492.00 · 2024-09-09
WARTINBEE WILLIAM JAMES III
Officer
$103,276
@ $491.79 · 2024-09-09
HENSEL SCOTT
Officer
$2.73M
@ $490.00 · 2024-08-29
DAWKINS ALWYN
Officer
$489,550
@ $489.55 · 2024-08-29
KRANICH ROBIN B.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $490.00 · 2024-08-29
HERKES CLAIRE L
Officer
$323,757
@ $483.22 · 2024-08-27
GENOVESE YVONNE
Officer
$214,244
@ $483.62 · 2024-08-26
SAFIAN CRAIG W
Chief Financial Officer
$3.05M
@ $483.57 · 2024-08-15
JAIN AKHIL
Officer
$194,000
@ $485.00 · 2024-08-15
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$4.80M
@ $480.08 · 2024-08-13
SMITH JAMES C
Director
$2.39M
@ $478.26 · 2024-08-07
DYKSTRA KAREN E
Director
$783,521
@ $465.55 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IT
FearGreed
😨Fear(28/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (28)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View IT Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IT vs PFE

Is Gartner, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to IT's 50.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $307 vs. $151).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Gartner, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

IT scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. IT scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Gartner, Inc. or Pfizer, Inc.?

IT earns 30.7% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.