Compare StocksIRM vs NVDA

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, IRM is overvalued at $114, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. NVDA is overvalued at $219, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -35%. Of the two, NVDA has the wider margin of safety.

IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
$114.24
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$219.43

Rewards

IRM
  • Trailing P/E of 81.0x is 32% below the historical average of 119.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
NVDA
  • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

IRM
  • PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.83 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
NVDA
  • FCF yield of 1.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 19 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IRM
NVDA
Valuation
$-436.09M
Free Cash Flow
$96.68B
-1.28%
FCF Yield
1.82%
81.02
Trailing P/E
27.74
41.87
Forward P/E
13.99
Quality & Moat
5.71%
ROIC
59.19%
N/A
ROE
117.21%
54.21%
Gross Margin
74.67%
2.70
PEG Ratio
0.45
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
7.74
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.12
3.08%
Dividend Yield
0.47%
IRM: 1Ties: 1NVDA: 8
IRMNVDA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NVDA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IRM
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-1.94B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NVDA
$18.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$220.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.12T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IRM
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $114.24
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NVDA
42.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 42.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $219.43
Fair Value: $378.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IRM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

NVDA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $219?

+18.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.4%

The market implies +18.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +21.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IRM
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NVDA
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IRM
-2.66
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NVDA
-1.06
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IRM
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 88.3%Retail & Other 10.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,578
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NVDA
Insiders 4.0%Institutions 71.4%Retail & Other 24.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,734
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IRM
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2,954
KELLY CHRISTIE BARTON
Director
$2,954
@ $89.52 · 2025-11-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NVDA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IRM
8
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $120.46M
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.39M
@ $114.08 · 2026-09-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$693,600
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$578,000
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.68M
@ $121.67 · 2026-08-07
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,200
@ $122.70 · 2026-08-07
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.51M
@ $127.13 · 2026-08-06
KIDD MARK
Officer
$753,720
@ $125.62 · 2026-07-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.73M
@ $122.83 · 2026-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$760,200
@ $126.70 · 2026-06-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.91M
@ $127.55 · 2026-06-01
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$902,220
@ $125.50 · 2026-05-21
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$94,209
@ $124.45 · 2026-05-20
ARWAY PAMELA M.
Director
$244,011
@ $128.97 · 2026-05-12
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.96M
@ $128.93 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$767,460
@ $127.91 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$616,260
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.95M
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$6.25M
@ $104.62 · 2026-03-19
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$10.48M
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.13M
@ $107.10 · 2026-03-04
ALLERTON JENNIFER
Director
$762,160
@ $108.88 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$643,620
@ $107.27 · 2026-03-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.00M
@ $109.39 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$649,020
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.16M
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
KIDD MARK
Officer
$498,600
@ $83.10 · 2026-01-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.20M
@ $83.17 · 2026-01-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$510,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.76M
@ $83.34 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.10M
@ $102.75 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$615,060
@ $102.51 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,591
@ $100.82 · 2025-10-31
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.07M
@ $102.34 · 2025-10-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$609,780
@ $101.63 · 2025-10-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.19M
@ $89.56 · 2025-09-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$546,300
@ $91.05 · 2025-09-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.54M
@ $94.55 · 2025-08-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$583,200
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.69M
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.94M
@ $100.36 · 2025-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$612,120
@ $102.02 · 2025-07-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.73M
@ $100.00 · 2025-07-01
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$89,973
@ $99.97 · 2025-06-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.83M
@ $98.77 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.70M
@ $98.19 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$807,384
@ $96.14 · 2025-05-22
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.64M
@ $96.09 · 2025-05-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.95M
@ $86.11 · 2025-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $91.33 · 2025-03-03
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$597,240
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$161,356
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.90M
@ $99.83 · 2025-02-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.25M
@ $104.85 · 2025-01-02
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$863,401
@ $104.49 · 2024-12-23
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $113.55 · 2024-12-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.76M
@ $118.47 · 2024-11-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.73M
@ $117.52 · 2024-10-08
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.70M
@ $116.43 · 2024-09-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NVDA
0
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $423.87M
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$133,750
@ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$942,944
@ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$3.36M
@ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$555,440
@ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$15.19M
@ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$4.43M
@ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$112,317
@ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$23.56M
@ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.73M
@ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.06M
@ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$41.34M
@ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.89M
@ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.05M
@ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$42.09M
@ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.23M
@ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.21M
@ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.18M
@ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$617,298
@ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.75M
@ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.28M
@ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.01M
@ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
Director
$15.38M
@ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.61M
@ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$27.12M
@ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.96M
@ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.66M
@ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.78M
@ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$40.18M
@ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$39.16M
@ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.22M
@ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$38.71M
@ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$37.59M
@ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$36.43M
@ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.55M
@ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$35.16M
@ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$30.47M
@ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
HUANG JEN-HSUN
Chief Executive Officer
$14.40M
@ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$646,469
@ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.74M
@ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$91,608
@ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
KRESS COLETTE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.79M
@ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
Officer
$525,585
@ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
SHAH AARTI S
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
Director
$6.16M
@ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
DABIRI JOHN O
Director
$292,930
@ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IRM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NVDA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
NVDA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View IRM Full AnalysisView NVDA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IRM vs NVDA

Is Iron Mountain Incorporated or NVIDIA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NVDA trades at a -34.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $163 vs. price $219), compared to IRM's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $114).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Iron Mountain Incorporated or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while IRM scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Iron Mountain Incorporated in financial distress?

IRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NVDA scores 4.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Iron Mountain Incorporated or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) generates a 1.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated's -1.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Iron Mountain Incorporated or NVIDIA Corporation?

NVDA earns 59.2% ROIC versus IRM's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Iron Mountain Incorporated's or NVIDIA Corporation's?

NVDA's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to IRM's 39/100 (Unsafe). NVDA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Does NVIDIA Corporation have accounting red flags?

NVDA's Beneish M-Score of -1.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, IRM scores -2.7, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

IRM vs NVDA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io