Compare StocksIRM vs JNJ

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) vs Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, IRM is overvalued at $114, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. JNJ is fairly valued at $270, with an intrinsic value of $303 and a margin of safety of 11%. Of the two, JNJ has the wider margin of safety.

IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
$114.19
VS
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$270.00

Rewards

IRM
  • Trailing P/E of 81.0x is 32% below the historical average of 119.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
JNJ
  • Johnson & Johnson has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Johnson & Johnson scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

IRM
  • PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.7x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.83 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
JNJ
  • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 31.3x is 57% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.80 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IRM
JNJ
Valuation
$-436.09M
Free Cash Flow
$16.89B
-1.28%
FCF Yield
2.60%
80.99
Trailing P/E
31.29
41.86
Forward P/E
21.98
Quality & Moat
5.71%
ROIC
16.85%
N/A
ROE
25.74%
54.21%
Gross Margin
68.14%
2.70
PEG Ratio
2.80
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
0.33
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
7.74
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.81
3.08%
Dividend Yield
2.01%
IRM: 1Ties: 2JNJ: 7
IRMJNJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JNJ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IRM
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-1.94B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JNJ
$0.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$40.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.63B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IRM
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $114.19
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JNJ
10.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $270.00
Fair Value: $302.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IRM

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

JNJ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $270?

+9.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.2%

The market implies +9.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IRM
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JNJ
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IRM
-2.66
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JNJ
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IRM
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 88.3%Retail & Other 10.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,578
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JNJ
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.7%Retail & Other 23.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,826
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IRM
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2,954
KELLY CHRISTIE BARTON
Director
$2,954
@ $89.52 · 2025-11-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JNJ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $257,688
MORIKIS JOHN G
Director
$257,688
@ $206.15 · 2025-11-26
WEINBERGER MARK A
Director
$147,220
@ $147.22 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IRM
8
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $120.46M
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.39M
@ $114.08 · 2026-09-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$693,600
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$578,000
@ $115.60 · 2026-09-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.68M
@ $121.67 · 2026-08-07
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,200
@ $122.70 · 2026-08-07
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.51M
@ $127.13 · 2026-08-06
KIDD MARK
Officer
$753,720
@ $125.62 · 2026-07-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.73M
@ $122.83 · 2026-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$760,200
@ $126.70 · 2026-06-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.91M
@ $127.55 · 2026-06-01
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$902,220
@ $125.50 · 2026-05-21
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$94,209
@ $124.45 · 2026-05-20
ARWAY PAMELA M.
Director
$244,011
@ $128.97 · 2026-05-12
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.96M
@ $128.93 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$767,460
@ $127.91 · 2026-05-08
KIDD MARK
Officer
$616,260
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.95M
@ $102.71 · 2026-04-01
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$6.25M
@ $104.62 · 2026-03-19
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$10.48M
@ $106.25 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.13M
@ $107.10 · 2026-03-04
ALLERTON JENNIFER
Director
$762,160
@ $108.88 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$643,620
@ $107.27 · 2026-03-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.00M
@ $109.39 · 2026-03-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$649,020
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.16M
@ $108.17 · 2026-02-20
KIDD MARK
Officer
$498,600
@ $83.10 · 2026-01-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.20M
@ $83.17 · 2026-01-02
KIDD MARK
Officer
$510,000
@ $85.00 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.76M
@ $83.34 · 2025-12-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.10M
@ $102.75 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$615,060
@ $102.51 · 2025-11-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$736,591
@ $100.82 · 2025-10-31
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.07M
@ $102.34 · 2025-10-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$609,780
@ $101.63 · 2025-10-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.19M
@ $89.56 · 2025-09-03
KIDD MARK
Officer
$546,300
@ $91.05 · 2025-09-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.54M
@ $94.55 · 2025-08-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$583,200
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.69M
@ $97.20 · 2025-08-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.94M
@ $100.36 · 2025-07-01
KIDD MARK
Officer
$612,120
@ $102.02 · 2025-07-01
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.73M
@ $100.00 · 2025-07-01
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$89,973
@ $99.97 · 2025-06-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.83M
@ $98.77 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$1.70M
@ $98.19 · 2025-06-02
MCINTOSH GREG W
Officer
$807,384
@ $96.14 · 2025-05-22
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.64M
@ $96.09 · 2025-05-02
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$5.95M
@ $86.11 · 2025-04-01
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$21.25M
@ $89.50 · 2025-03-04
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $91.33 · 2025-03-03
BORGES DANIEL
Officer
$597,240
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$161,356
@ $92.84 · 2025-03-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$6.90M
@ $99.83 · 2025-02-03
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.25M
@ $104.85 · 2025-01-02
BHARGAVA MITHU
Officer
$863,401
@ $104.49 · 2024-12-23
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $113.55 · 2024-12-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.76M
@ $118.47 · 2024-11-11
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.73M
@ $117.52 · 2024-10-08
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.70M
@ $116.43 · 2024-09-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JNJ
6
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $132.73M
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$9.23M
@ $274.74 · 2026-09-02
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$3.95M
@ $263.36 · 2026-08-17
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$32.20M
@ $261.17 · 2026-08-13
FORMINARD ELIZABETH
Officer
$4.09M
@ $257.00 · 2026-08-06
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$12.52M
@ $258.15 · 2026-08-05
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$5.79M
@ $251.27 · 2026-07-20
WENGEL KATHRYN E
Chief Technology Officer
$2.41M
@ $241.15 · 2026-06-11
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $247.87 · 2026-02-27
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$324,763
@ $245.66 · 2026-02-20
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$5.53M
@ $244.33 · 2026-02-18
REED JOHN C
Officer
$13.11M
@ $243.00 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$21.77M
@ $242.80 · 2026-02-17
SWANSON JAMES D
Chief Technology Officer
$15.11M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
BROADHURST VANESSA
Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.39 · 2026-02-17
REED JOHN C
Officer
$4.19M
@ $192.71 · 2025-10-17
TAUBERT JENNIFER L
Officer
$10.04M
@ $177.81 · 2025-09-04
DUATO JOAQUIN BOIX
Chief Executive Officer
$22.55M
@ $179.21 · 2025-08-22
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.98M
@ $176.91 · 2025-08-15
REED JOHN C
Officer
$3.13M
@ $163.55 · 2025-07-17
DECKER ROBERT J
Officer
$1.16M
@ $165.88 · 2025-02-25
SCHMID TIMOTHY
Officer
$62,928
@ $156.15 · 2025-02-18
WOLK JOSEPH J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $153.89 · 2025-02-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IRM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JNJ
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
JNJ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View IRM Full AnalysisView JNJ Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IRM vs JNJ

Is Iron Mountain Incorporated or Johnson & Johnson more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, JNJ trades at a 10.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $303 vs. price $270), compared to IRM's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $114).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Iron Mountain Incorporated or Johnson & Johnson?

JNJ scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while IRM scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Iron Mountain Incorporated in financial distress?

IRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JNJ scores 3.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Iron Mountain Incorporated or Johnson & Johnson?

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) generates a 2.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Iron Mountain Incorporated's -1.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Iron Mountain Incorporated or Johnson & Johnson?

JNJ earns 16.9% ROIC versus IRM's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Iron Mountain Incorporated's or Johnson & Johnson's?

JNJ's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to IRM's 39/100 (Unsafe). JNJ has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

IRM vs JNJ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io