Compare StocksIR vs V

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, IR is overvalued at $71, with a DCF intrinsic value of $51 and a margin of safety of -40%. V is overvalued at $370, with an intrinsic value of $316 and a margin of safety of -17%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$71.44
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$369.69

Rewards

IR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 29.5x is 32% below the historical average of 43.3x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.58 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

IR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.05 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
V
  • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • 9 insider sales totaling $44.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IR
V
Valuation
$1.11B
Free Cash Flow
$20.40B
4.00%
FCF Yield
2.96%
29.52
Trailing P/E
31.44
18.24
Forward P/E
24.64
Quality & Moat
6.99%
ROIC
39.37%
9.47%
ROE
61.19%
42.82%
Gross Margin
97.72%
0.58
PEG Ratio
1.68
Balance Sheet Safety
0.36
Net Debt / Equity
0.29
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.85
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.32
0.11%
Dividend Yield
0.72%
IR: 4Ties: 1V: 7
IRV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IR
$4.67
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.82B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.47
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$243.21B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IR
39.7% Overvalued
Price is 39.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $71.44
Fair Value: $51.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
16.9% Overvalued
Price is 16.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $369.69
Fair Value: $316.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $71?

+14.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.5%

The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $370?

+15.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IR
59/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IR
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 105.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,278
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 90.2%Retail & Other 9.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,988
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IR
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00M
SATPATHY AUROBIND
Director
$1.00M
@ $86.68 · 2026-08-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IR
0
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $59.54M
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$2.68M
@ $88.00 · 2026-04-13
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$11.11M
@ $94.11 · 2026-03-02
KINI VIKRAM
Chief Financial Officer
$2.74M
@ $96.50 · 2026-02-20
HUMPHREY JOHN R.
Director
$412,370
@ $95.90 · 2026-02-19
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$90,000
@ $100.00 · 2026-02-18
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$9.17M
@ $99.25 · 2026-02-17
SCHESKE MICHAEL J
Officer
$1.87M
@ $97.67 · 2026-02-17
KEENE KATHLEEN M
Officer
$1.19M
@ $99.46 · 2026-02-17
SCHIESL ANDREW R
General Counsel
$1.76M
@ $98.00 · 2026-02-17
HEPDING ELIZABETH MELOY
Officer
$1.77M
@ $97.11 · 2026-02-17
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$44,000
@ $100.00 · 2026-02-11
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$9.75M
@ $97.54 · 2026-02-04
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$16.83M
@ $88.12 · 2026-01-16
SCHESKE MICHAEL J
Officer
$119,086
@ $80.63 · 2025-12-01
REYNAL VICENTE
Chief Executive Officer
$3.21M
@ $83.03 · 2025-05-20
HEPDING ELIZABETH MELOY
Officer
$293,230
@ $83.78 · 2025-05-14
SCHIESL ANDREW R
General Counsel
$976,316
@ $84.90 · 2025-05-13
SCHIESL ANDREW R
General Counsel
$1.15M
@ $87.05 · 2025-02-18
SCHESKE MICHAEL J
Officer
$246,621
@ $97.44 · 2024-11-05
SCHIESL ANDREW R
General Counsel
$2.30M
@ $95.08 · 2024-11-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
9
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $87.76M
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$687,691
@ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$773,378
@ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$6.65M
@ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IR
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View IR Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IR vs V

Is Ingersoll Rand Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -16.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $316 vs. price $370), compared to IR's -39.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $51 vs. $71).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Ingersoll Rand Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while IR scores 59/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Ingersoll Rand Inc. or Visa Inc.?

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) generates a 4.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Ingersoll Rand Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 39.4% ROIC versus IR's 7.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to IR's 88/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.