Compare StocksIP vs NVDA

International Paper Company (IP) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, IP is undervalued at $41, with a DCF intrinsic value of $124527309897 and a margin of safety of 100%. NVDA is overvalued at $201, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, IP has the wider margin of safety.

IP
International Paper Company
$40.83
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$200.75

Rewards

IP
    NVDA
    • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    IP
    • ROIC has declined by 9.7 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • International Paper Company scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.87 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    NVDA
    • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
    • 28 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    IP
    NVDA
    Valuation
    $1.76B
    Free Cash Flow
    $96.68B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.99%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    30.79
    13.89
    Forward P/E
    15.57
    Quality & Moat
    1.71%
    ROIC
    63.06%
    -16.48%
    ROE
    114.29%
    29.61%
    Gross Margin
    74.14%
    1.58
    PEG Ratio
    0.55
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.62
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.34
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.24
    4.53%
    Dividend Yield
    0.50%
    IP: 2Ties: 1NVDA: 7
    IPNVDA

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    IP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    NVDA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    IP
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-4.93B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$4.76
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NVDA
    $16.59
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $220.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.66T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    IP
    100.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $40.83
    Fair Value: $124527309897.42
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NVDA
    46.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 46.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $200.75
    Fair Value: $378.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    IP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $41?

    -11.8%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

    NVDA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $201?

    +17.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +20.2%

    The market implies +17.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    IP
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    NVDA
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    IP
    -2.75
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NVDA
    -1.06
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    IP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.5%Retail & Other 0.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,181
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NVDA
    Insiders 4.0%Institutions 70.7%Retail & Other 25.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,576
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    IP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.32M
    TOZIER SCOTT A
    Director
    $313,009
    @ $31.30 · 2026-05-01
    GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
    Director
    $1.00M
    @ $38.33 · 2026-03-12
    SILVERNAIL ANDREW K.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $39.98 · 2026-01-30
    CONNOR CHRISTOPHER M
    Director
    $1.01M
    @ $40.37 · 2026-01-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NVDA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    IP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $409,815
    SAAB JOSEPH R
    General Counsel
    $409,815
    @ $45.53 · 2025-09-16
    GOUGHNOUR HOLLY G
    Officer
    $336,344
    @ $44.85 · 2025-05-05
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $35,034
    @ $58.39 · 2024-11-29
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $33,714
    @ $56.19 · 2024-11-15
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $32,100
    @ $53.50 · 2024-10-31
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $28,848
    @ $48.08 · 2024-10-15
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $29,208
    @ $48.68 · 2024-09-30
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $29,688
    @ $49.48 · 2024-09-16
    SAAB JOSEPH R
    General Counsel
    $115,412
    @ $47.30 · 2024-09-12
    GOUGHNOUR HOLLY G
    Officer
    $236,100
    @ $47.22 · 2024-09-06
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $28,740
    @ $47.90 · 2024-08-30
    ELLIS CLAYTON R
    Officer
    $439,470
    @ $48.83 · 2024-08-28
    SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
    Director
    $27,660
    @ $46.10 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NVDA
    1
    Sells (3M)
    28
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $743.42M
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $133,750
    @ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $942,944
    @ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
    SHAH AARTI S
    Director
    $3.36M
    @ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $555,440
    @ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $15.19M
    @ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $112,317
    @ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.20M
    @ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.56M
    @ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.73M
    @ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $41.06M
    @ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $41.34M
    @ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.89M
    @ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.05M
    @ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.09M
    @ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.23M
    @ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.21M
    @ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.18M
    @ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $617,298
    @ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.75M
    @ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.28M
    @ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.01M
    @ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.61M
    @ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
    HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
    Director
    $15.38M
    @ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $27.12M
    @ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.96M
    @ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.66M
    @ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.78M
    @ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.18M
    @ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.16M
    @ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.22M
    @ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.71M
    @ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.59M
    @ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $36.43M
    @ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $35.55M
    @ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $35.16M
    @ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $30.47M
    @ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.40M
    @ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $646,469
    @ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $91,608
    @ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
    BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
    Director
    $6.74M
    @ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
    KRESS COLETTE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.79M
    @ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $525,585
    @ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
    SHAH AARTI S
    Director
    $2.37M
    @ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
    BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
    Director
    $6.16M
    @ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $292,930
    @ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
    KRESS COLETTE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $9.03M
    @ $135.40 · 2024-12-13
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $608,775
    @ $135.28 · 2024-12-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    IP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(43/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NVDA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(51/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    IP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
    NVDA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
    View IP Full AnalysisView NVDA Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: IP vs NVDA

    Is International Paper Company or NVIDIA Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, IP trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $124527309897 vs. price $41), compared to NVDA's -22.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $163 vs. $201).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, International Paper Company or NVIDIA Corporation?

    NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while IP scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is International Paper Company in financial distress?

    IP's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NVDA scores 4.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, International Paper Company or NVIDIA Corporation?

    NVDA earns 63.1% ROIC versus IP's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, International Paper Company's or NVIDIA Corporation's?

    NVDA's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to IP's 56/100 (Borderline). NVDA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

    Does NVIDIA Corporation have accounting red flags?

    NVDA's Beneish M-Score of -1.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, IP scores -2.8, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.

    IP vs NVDA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io