Compare StocksIP vs MSFT

International Paper Company (IP) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, IP is undervalued at $37, with a DCF intrinsic value of $229 and a margin of safety of 84%. MSFT is fairly valued at $379, with an intrinsic value of $440 and a margin of safety of 14%. Of the two, IP has the wider margin of safety.

IP
International Paper Company
$36.82
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$379.40

Rewards

IP
  • FCF yield of 8.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

IP
  • ROIC has declined by 9.7 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • International Paper Company scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 51% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
MSFT
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Insiders have sold $10.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
IP
MSFT
Valuation
$1.71B
Free Cash Flow
$71.61B
8.78%
FCF Yield
2.54%
N/A
Trailing P/E
22.61
13.75
Forward P/E
19.61
Quality & Moat
2.91%
ROIC
21.58%
-16.04%
ROE
34.01%
29.69%
Gross Margin
68.31%
1.58
PEG Ratio
1.22
Balance Sheet Safety
0.58
Net Debt / Equity
0.11
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.13
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.26
5.12%
Dividend Yield
0.92%
IP: 3Ties: 1MSFT: 7
IPMSFT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
IP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
IP
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-4.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
IP
83.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 83.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $36.82
Fair Value: $229.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
13.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $379.40
Fair Value: $439.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
IP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $37?

+5.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $379?

+12.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.1%

The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +17.1%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
IP
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
IP
-2.75
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
IP
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.4%Retail & Other 0.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,180
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders8,114
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
IP
1
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.32M
TOZIER SCOTT A
Director
$313,009
@ $31.30 · 2026-05-01
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$1.00M
@ $38.33 · 2026-03-12
CONNOR CHRISTOPHER M
Director
$1.01M
@ $40.37 · 2026-01-30
SILVERNAIL ANDREW K.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $39.98 · 2026-01-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.99M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
IP
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $409,815
SAAB JOSEPH R
General Counsel
$409,815
@ $45.53 · 2025-09-16
GOUGHNOUR HOLLY G
Officer
$336,344
@ $44.85 · 2025-05-05
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$35,034
@ $58.39 · 2024-11-29
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$33,714
@ $56.19 · 2024-11-15
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$32,100
@ $53.50 · 2024-10-31
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$28,848
@ $48.08 · 2024-10-15
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$29,208
@ $48.68 · 2024-09-30
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$29,688
@ $49.48 · 2024-09-16
SAAB JOSEPH R
General Counsel
$115,412
@ $47.30 · 2024-09-12
GOUGHNOUR HOLLY G
Officer
$236,100
@ $47.22 · 2024-09-06
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$28,740
@ $47.90 · 2024-08-30
ELLIS CLAYTON R
Officer
$439,470
@ $48.83 · 2024-08-28
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$27,660
@ $46.10 · 2024-08-15
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$27,756
@ $46.26 · 2024-07-31
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$26,208
@ $43.68 · 2024-07-15
SULLIVAN KATHRYN D.
Director
$25,662
@ $42.77 · 2024-06-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $121.03M
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.81M
@ $402.84 · 2026-06-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $412.45 · 2026-06-08
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.15M
@ $460.99 · 2026-06-01
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$519,242
@ $411.44 · 2026-05-14
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
IP
FearGreed
😨Fear(33/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
IP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View IP Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: IP vs MSFT

Is International Paper Company or Microsoft Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, IP trades at a 83.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $229 vs. price $37), compared to MSFT's 13.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $440 vs. $379).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, International Paper Company or Microsoft Corporation?

MSFT scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while IP scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is International Paper Company in financial distress?

IP's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MSFT scores 9.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, International Paper Company or Microsoft Corporation?

International Paper Company (IP) generates a 8.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Microsoft Corporation's 2.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, International Paper Company or Microsoft Corporation?

MSFT earns 21.6% ROIC versus IP's 2.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, International Paper Company's or Microsoft Corporation's?

MSFT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to IP's 50/100 (Borderline). MSFT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.