Compare StocksINTU vs ZBH

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$406.18
VS
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$83.20

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
ZBH
  • Gross margin of 70.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.57 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Dividend yield of 1.16% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

INTU
  • 22 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
ZBH

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    ZBH
    Valuation
    $5.30B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.42B
    4.69%
    FCF Yield
    8.82%
    26.44
    Trailing P/E
    21.56
    15.34
    Forward P/E
    9.25
    Quality & Moat
    11.26%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    20.30%
    ROE
    5.56%
    80.90%
    Gross Margin
    70.18%
    0.55
    PEG Ratio
    0.63
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.36
    Debt / Equity
    0.60
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.64
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.75
    1.16%
    Dividend Yield
    1.16%
    INTU: 7Ties: 2ZBH: 3
    INTUZBH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ZBH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $12.31
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.10B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$75.17B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ZBH
    $-4.43
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.05B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-9.07B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    2.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 2.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $406.18
    Fair Value: $416.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ZBH
    140.8% Overvalued
    Price is 140.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $83.20
    Fair Value: $34.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $406?

    +13.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.1%

    The market implies +13.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    ZBH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $83?

    +14.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.0%

    The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ZBH
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ZBH
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 90.9%Retail & Other 6.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,894
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ZBH
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 104.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,305
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ZBH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    1
    Sells (3M)
    22
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $112.35M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $228,121
    @ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $15.86M
    @ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.06M
    @ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $11.16M
    @ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $6.21M
    @ $646.47 · 2024-12-05
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $2.36M
    @ $646.83 · 2024-12-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ZBH
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $950,612
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $250,849
    @ $94.66 · 2026-03-12
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $96,490
    @ $96.49 · 2026-02-12
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $124,302
    @ $103.58 · 2025-09-11
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $156,225
    @ $104.15 · 2025-09-08
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $153,735
    @ $102.49 · 2025-08-18
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $74,011
    @ $92.51 · 2025-06-13
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $95,000
    @ $95.00 · 2025-06-11
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $150,649
    @ $104.40 · 2025-03-05
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $114.69 · 2024-05-31
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ZBH
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(25/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    ZBH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView ZBH Full Analysis
    INTU vs ZBH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io