Compare StocksINTU vs VRSK

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTU is undervalued at $267, with a DCF intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 50%. VRSK is fairly valued at $174, with an intrinsic value of $192 and a margin of safety of 9%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00
VS
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$173.80

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
VRSK
  • Verisk Analytics, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 70.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Verisk Analytics, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
VRSK
  • 6 insider sales totaling $3.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
VRSK
Valuation
$5.23B
Free Cash Flow
$944.36M
7.16%
FCF Yield
4.15%
16.30
Trailing P/E
26.49
9.77
Forward P/E
20.08
Quality & Moat
28.21%
ROIC
23.85%
22.50%
ROE
N/A
80.79%
Gross Margin
69.98%
0.73
PEG Ratio
1.74
Balance Sheet Safety
0.01
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.72
1.71%
Dividend Yield
1.06%
INTU: 9Ties: 1VRSK: 0
INTUVRSK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VRSK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VRSK
$2.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.81B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
50.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $535.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VRSK
9.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 9.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $173.80
Fair Value: $191.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

VRSK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $174?

+11.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.5%

The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VRSK
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VRSK
-3.05
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,820
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VRSK
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 105.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,412
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VRSK
0
Buys (3M)
7
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.02M
STEVENSON KIMBERLY S.
Director
$179,200
@ $179.20 · 2026-02-20
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Director
$180,000
@ $180.00 · 2026-02-20
HENDRICK GREGORY S.
Director
$90,080
@ $180.16 · 2026-02-20
PURTILL SABRA R
Director
$98,078
@ $217.95 · 2025-10-31
DAILEY JEFFREY J
Director
$108,515
@ $217.03 · 2025-10-31
HENDRICK GREGORY S.
Director
$108,070
@ $216.14 · 2025-10-31
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Director
$259,800
@ $259.80 · 2025-08-13
LANE WENDY E.
Director
$158,184
@ $263.64 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.47M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VRSK
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.24M
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$851,103
@ $182.21 · 2026-06-05
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$1.20M
@ $177.63 · 2026-06-02
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$408,777
@ $174.99 · 2026-06-01
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$400,476
@ $171.51 · 2026-05-22
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$63,688
@ $159.22 · 2026-05-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$68,628
@ $171.57 · 2026-04-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$81,884
@ $204.71 · 2026-03-17
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$65,862
@ $219.54 · 2025-12-16
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$480,766
@ $218.53 · 2025-11-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$65,097
@ $216.99 · 2025-11-17
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$72,669
@ $242.23 · 2025-10-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$76,416
@ $254.72 · 2025-09-16
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.44M
@ $265.00 · 2025-09-03
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$589,611
@ $268.00 · 2025-08-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$80,400
@ $268.00 · 2025-08-15
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.47M
@ $272.03 · 2025-08-04
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$91,164
@ $303.88 · 2025-07-15
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$98,080
@ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.63M
@ $300.86 · 2025-07-03
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$92,670
@ $308.90 · 2025-06-17
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$3.65M
@ $313.06 · 2025-06-13
DAFFAN NICHOLAS
Chief Technology Officer
$1.72M
@ $318.10 · 2025-06-04
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$671,055
@ $305.02 · 2025-05-16
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$90,651
@ $302.17 · 2025-05-15
GROVER DAVID J.
Officer
$1.76M
@ $307.68 · 2025-05-09
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$88,614
@ $295.38 · 2025-04-15
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$337,029
@ $285.86 · 2025-04-07
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$634,689
@ $288.50 · 2025-03-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$86,349
@ $287.83 · 2025-03-17
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$348,229
@ $295.36 · 2025-03-07
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$347,746
@ $294.95 · 2025-02-07
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$595,429
@ $282.06 · 2025-01-17
HANSEN BRUCE EDWARD
Director
$321,643
@ $272.81 · 2025-01-07
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$56,750
@ $283.75 · 2024-12-16
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$567,200
@ $283.60 · 2024-11-18
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$57,298
@ $286.49 · 2024-11-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$54,266
@ $271.33 · 2024-10-15
LISS SAMUEL G.
Director
$889,450
@ $265.27 · 2024-10-04
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$54,174
@ $270.87 · 2024-09-16
GROVER DAVID J.
Officer
$1.74M
@ $271.56 · 2024-08-29
SHAVEL LEE M
Chief Executive Officer
$534,770
@ $267.38 · 2024-08-16
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$53,718
@ $268.59 · 2024-08-15
MANN ELIZABETH
Chief Financial Officer
$55,476
@ $277.38 · 2024-07-15
BECKLES KATHY CARD
Officer
$88,744
@ $272.22 · 2024-07-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VRSK
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
VRSK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
View INTU Full AnalysisView VRSK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs VRSK

Is Intuit Inc. or Verisk Analytics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $267), compared to VRSK's 9.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $192 vs. $174).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?

VRSK scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Verisk Analytics, Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus VRSK's 23.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s?

VRSK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). VRSK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.