Compare StocksINTU vs USB

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs U.S. Bancorp (USB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $321, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 43%. USB is undervalued at $60, with an intrinsic value of $104 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$320.98
VS
USB
U.S. Bancorp
$60.14

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
USB
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.15 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

INTU
    USB
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $5.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    USB
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    10.05%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    19.51
    Trailing P/E
    12.00
    11.74
    Forward P/E
    10.39
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    8.58%
    23.60%
    ROE
    12.62%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    1.89
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    3.62%
    INTU: 4Ties: 1USB: 3
    INTUUSB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    USB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-11.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    USB
    $1.80
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $9.04B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$16.23B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    43.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $320.98
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    USB
    42.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 42.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $60.14
    Fair Value: $103.77
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $321?

    +5.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.7%

    The market implies +5.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    USB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    USB
    60/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    USB
    -2.43
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    USB
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,626
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    USB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    GILLANI ALEEM
    Director
    $186,600
    @ $37.32 · 2025-04-21
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    USB
    3
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $20.41M
    KEDIA GUNJAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.70M
    @ $62.37 · 2026-08-28
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.45M
    @ $63.28 · 2026-07-23
    PHILIPSON STEPHEN L.
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $63.08 · 2026-07-20
    DILIP VENKATACHARI
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.92M
    @ $55.52 · 2026-05-05
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $2.28M
    @ $57.00 · 2026-04-21
    RUNKEL MARK G
    Officer
    $1.95M
    @ $60.65 · 2026-02-06
    BARCELOS ELCIO R.T.
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $58.43 · 2026-02-03
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.26M
    @ $46.86 · 2025-10-20
    CECERE ANDREW J
    Director
    $6.51M
    @ $46.35 · 2025-10-20
    STARK LISA R
    Officer
    $923,400
    @ $46.40 · 2025-07-21
    BADRAN SOUHEIL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $46.34 · 2025-07-21
    ROY ARIJIT
    Officer
    $97,701
    @ $43.68 · 2025-03-07
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $47.59 · 2025-02-06
    CHOSY JAMES L
    General Counsel
    $1.02M
    @ $47.65 · 2025-02-05
    CECERE ANDREW J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.82M
    @ $47.25 · 2025-02-04
    DOLAN TERRANCE ROBERT
    Officer
    $3.11M
    @ $46.96 · 2025-02-03
    STARK LISA R
    Officer
    $151,144
    @ $47.10 · 2025-02-03
    RICHARD JODI L
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $49.03 · 2024-10-18
    KOTWAL SHAILESH M
    Officer
    $1.74M
    @ $49.74 · 2024-10-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    USB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    USB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView USB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs USB

    Is Intuit Inc. or U.S. Bancorp more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $321), compared to USB's 42.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $104 vs. $60).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or U.S. Bancorp?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while USB scores 60/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is U.S. Bancorp in financial distress?

    USB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or U.S. Bancorp?

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus USB's 8.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or U.S. Bancorp's?

    USB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). USB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.