Compare Stocks › INTU vs TFC

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTU is undervalued at $341, with a DCF intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. TFC is undervalued at $49, with an intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of 36%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09
VS
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$48.79

Rewards

INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
TFC

    Risks

    INTU
      TFC
      • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
      • ⚠Truist Financial Corporation scores only 10/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
      • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.18 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTU
      TFC
      Valuation
      $8.62B
      Free Cash Flow
      N/A
      9.45%
      FCF Yield
      N/A
      20.72
      Trailing P/E
      12.57
      12.66
      Forward P/E
      9.93
      Quality & Moat
      10.90%
      ROIC
      5.23%
      23.60%
      ROE
      8.16%
      80.98%
      Gross Margin
      0.00%
      1.08
      PEG Ratio
      1.10
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.06
      Net Debt / Equity
      N/A
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.18
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      N/A
      1.62%
      Dividend Yield
      4.26%
      INTU: 3Ties: 2TFC: 3
      INTUTFC

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTU

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      TFC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTU
      $-10.70
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $7.83B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-83.73B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      TFC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-228.0M
      Δ Market Cap
      +$5.03B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTU
      39.9% Margin of Safety
      Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $341.09
      Fair Value: $567.66
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      TFC
      35.7% Margin of Safety
      Price is 35.7% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $48.79
      Fair Value: $75.93
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTU

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

      +6.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -0.9%

      The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      TFC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTU
      94/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      TFC
      10/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTU
      -2.98
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      TFC
      -2.41
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTU
      Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,538
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      TFC
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,128
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTU
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $541,665
      PRABHU VASANT M.
      Director
      $541,665
      @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      TFC
      1
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.21M
      LYONS MICHAEL P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.21M
      @ $48.36 · 2026-10-28
      ROGERS WILLIAM H JR
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.66M
      @ $48.56 · 2024-11-25
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTU
      2
      Sells (3M)
      10
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $3.54M
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $92,728
      @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $314,288
      @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $74,499
      @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $80,145
      @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $289,448
      @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $457,046
      @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $840,097
      @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $741,172
      @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $219,763
      @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $435,354
      @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $792,160
      @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $665,951
      @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $27,930
      @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $255,887
      @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $521,891
      @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $689,400
      @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.03M
      @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.25M
      @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $887,583
      @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $26.12M
      @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $19.29M
      @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $30.46M
      @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
      MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
      General Counsel
      $12.18M
      @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.66M
      @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $340,143
      @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $5.00M
      @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $4.43M
      @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
      BURTON EVE B
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      TFC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      5
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $1.97M
      WILSON DONTA L
      Officer
      $688,618
      @ $51.85 · 2026-07-31
      BOYER K DAVID JR
      Director
      $202,090
      @ $50.70 · 2026-07-23
      POWELL CYNTHIA B
      Officer
      $183,715
      @ $52.49 · 2026-02-02
      MAGUIRE MICHAEL BARON
      Chief Financial Officer
      $651,664
      @ $50.13 · 2026-01-26
      BOYER K DAVID JR
      Director
      $239,682
      @ $46.45 · 2025-11-25
      BENDER BRADLEY D
      Officer
      $566,689
      @ $45.19 · 2025-07-22
      BOYER K DAVID JR
      Director
      $229,444
      @ $46.20 · 2024-12-04
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTU
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      TFC
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(57/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTU
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      TFC
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
      View INTU Full AnalysisView TFC Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs TFC

      Is Intuit Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to TFC's 35.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $76 vs. $49).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation?▼

      INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while TFC scores 10/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Truist Financial Corporation in financial distress?▼

      TFC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation?▼

      INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus TFC's 5.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Truist Financial Corporation's?▼

      INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to TFC's 75/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

      INTU vs TFC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io