Compare Stocks › INTU vs SYK

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Stryker Corporation (SYK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTU is undervalued at $341, with a DCF intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. SYK is overvalued at $292, with an intrinsic value of $208 and a margin of safety of -40%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09
VS
SYK
Stryker Corporation
$291.86

Rewards

INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SYK
  • ★Gross margin of 65.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Stryker Corporation scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 28.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
SYK
Valuation
$8.62B
Free Cash Flow
$4.45B
9.45%
FCF Yield
4.01%
20.72
Trailing P/E
31.08
12.66
Forward P/E
17.89
Quality & Moat
10.90%
ROIC
12.68%
23.60%
ROE
16.02%
80.98%
Gross Margin
65.70%
1.08
PEG Ratio
1.37
Balance Sheet Safety
0.06
Net Debt / Equity
0.46
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
1.62%
Dividend Yield
1.21%
INTU: 10Ties: 1SYK: 1
INTUSYK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SYK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$-10.70
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.83B
Δ Market Cap
$-83.73B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SYK
$7.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.76B
Δ Market Cap
+$41.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
39.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $341.09
Fair Value: $567.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SYK
40.2% Overvalued
Price is 40.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $291.86
Fair Value: $208.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

+6.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.9%

The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SYK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $292?

+14.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.0%

The market implies +14.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SYK
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.98
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SYK
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,538
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SYK
Insiders 5.4%Institutions 83.4%Retail & Other 11.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,999
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SYK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
2
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.54M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$92,728
@ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$314,288
@ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$74,499
@ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SYK
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.62M
KING DEBRA
Officer
$277,787
@ $336.30 · 2026-08-18
FLETCHER ROBERT S
Officer
$1.39M
@ $306.87 · 2026-05-28
PIERCE JAMES ANDREW
Officer
$175,215
@ $368.87 · 2026-02-02
WELLS PRESTON WENDELL
Chief Financial Officer
$60,370
@ $365.88 · 2025-11-20
BERRY WILLIAM E JR
Officer
$713,802
@ $365.49 · 2025-11-14
MENON VIJU S
Officer
$195,305
@ $390.61 · 2025-08-25
FLETCHER ROBERT S
Officer
$701,630
@ $393.07 · 2025-08-20
BERRY WILLIAM E JR
Officer
$482,202
@ $388.56 · 2025-05-12
GOLSTON ALLAN C
Director
$941,586
@ $383.07 · 2025-02-18
STILES SPENCER S
Officer
$201,056
@ $391.16 · 2024-11-15
LOBO KEVIN A
Chief Executive Officer
$21.13M
@ $368.70 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SYK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
SYK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View INTU Full AnalysisView SYK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SYK

Is Intuit Inc. or Stryker Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to SYK's -40.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $208 vs. $292).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Stryker Corporation?▼

SYK scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Stryker Corporation?▼

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 9.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Stryker Corporation's 4.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Stryker Corporation?▼

SYK earns 12.7% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Stryker Corporation's?▼

SYK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). SYK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

INTU vs SYK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io