Compare Stocks › INTU vs SWK

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTU is undervalued at $341, with a DCF intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. SWK is overvalued at $103, with an intrinsic value of $89 and a margin of safety of -17%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09
VS
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$103.44

Rewards

INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SWK
  • ★FCF yield of 9.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

INTU
    SWK
    • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    SWK
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.42B
    9.45%
    FCF Yield
    9.08%
    20.72
    Trailing P/E
    25.29
    12.66
    Forward P/E
    16.40
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    7.18%
    23.60%
    ROE
    6.89%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    32.21%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    1.39
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.52
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.58
    1.62%
    Dividend Yield
    3.25%
    INTU: 9Ties: 2SWK: 1
    INTUSWK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    SWK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-10.70
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-83.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SWK
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.09B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$24.0M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    39.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $341.09
    Fair Value: $567.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SWK
    16.7% Overvalued
    Price is 16.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $103.44
    Fair Value: $88.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

    +6.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.9%

    The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    SWK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $103?

    +14.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +3.1%

    The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SWK
    48/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SWK
    -2.78
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,538
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SWK
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,043
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SWK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    2
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.54M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SWK
    1
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $917,928
    GREULACH SCOT
    Officer
    $105,164
    @ $103.61 · 2026-08-07
    LINK JANET M
    General Counsel
    $812,764
    @ $69.08 · 2025-11-06
    LINK JANET M
    General Counsel
    $169,630
    @ $85.24 · 2025-02-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SWK
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(70/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    SWK
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView SWK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SWK

    Is Intuit Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to SWK's -16.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $89 vs. $103).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?▼

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while SWK scores 48/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    SWK's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?▼

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 9.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s 9.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.?▼

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus SWK's 7.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s?▼

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SWK's 39/100 (Unsafe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    INTU vs SWK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io