Compare StocksINTU vs SRE

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Sempra (SRE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTU is undervalued at $267, with a DCF intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 50%. SRE is overvalued at $91, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1069%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00
VS
SRE
Sempra
$90.69

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
SRE
  • PEG ratio of 0.82 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
SRE
  • Sempra scores only 29/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Trailing P/E of 30.8x is 36% above the historical average of 22.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
SRE
Valuation
$5.23B
Free Cash Flow
$-28.24B
7.16%
FCF Yield
-47.64%
16.30
Trailing P/E
30.85
9.77
Forward P/E
16.38
Quality & Moat
28.21%
ROIC
4.14%
22.50%
ROE
5.69%
80.79%
Gross Margin
42.46%
0.73
PEG Ratio
0.82
Balance Sheet Safety
0.01
Net Debt / Equity
0.83
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.34
1.71%
Dividend Yield
2.87%
INTU: 10Ties: 1SRE: 1
INTUSRE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SRE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SRE
$2.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
50.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $535.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SRE
1069.4% Overvalued
Price is 1069.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $90.69
Fair Value: $7.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SRE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SRE
29/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SRE
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,820
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SRE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 6.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,708
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SRE
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $576,979
KIRK JENNIFER M
Director
$93,440
@ $93.44 · 2026-03-12
MARK RICHARD J
Director
$251,164
@ $93.30 · 2026-03-11
WARNER CYNTHIA J
Director
$232,375
@ $92.95 · 2026-03-11
FERRERO PABLO A
Director
$184,496
@ $70.96 · 2025-03-17
CONESA ANDRES
Director
$100,156
@ $71.54 · 2025-03-17
YARDLEY JAMES C
Director
$350,024
@ $69.75 · 2025-03-12
MEARS MICHAEL N
Director
$67,700
@ $67.70 · 2025-03-10
MARK RICHARD J
Director
$499,840
@ $69.81 · 2025-03-06
WARNER CYNTHIA J
Director
$49,455
@ $70.65 · 2025-03-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.47M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SRE
3
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.99M
FERRERO PABLO A
Director
$232,778
@ $89.53 · 2026-05-18
DAY DIANA L
Officer
$304,029
@ $92.13 · 2026-05-14
BIRD JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$109,066
@ $96.69 · 2026-04-01
WOLD DYAN Z.
Officer
$146,790
@ $95.38 · 2026-03-16
SEDGWICK KAREN L
Chief Financial Officer
$451,041
@ $92.58 · 2026-03-09
MARTIN JEFFREY W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $88.39 · 2026-01-05
SEDGWICK KAREN L
Chief Financial Officer
$698,082
@ $92.29 · 2025-11-24
WINN CAROLINE ANN
Officer
$549,540
@ $91.59 · 2025-11-19
WOLD DYAN Z.
Officer
$137,984
@ $91.38 · 2025-11-19
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$400,001
@ $92.55 · 2025-11-07
SAGARA KEVIN C
Director
$1.29M
@ $89.50 · 2025-09-29
SAGARA KEVIN C
Director
$2.43M
@ $84.21 · 2025-09-15
WINN CAROLINE ANN
Officer
$419,399
@ $82.01 · 2025-08-14
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$126,080
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-23
DAY DIANA L
Officer
$595,212
@ $74.26 · 2025-05-14
BIRD JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$343,096
@ $71.23 · 2025-04-01
WALL PETER R.
Officer
$580,076
@ $70.81 · 2025-03-18
LARROQUE ALEXANDER LISA
Officer
$225,717
@ $81.93 · 2025-02-11
MARTIN JEFFREY W
Chief Executive Officer
$4.13M
@ $82.94 · 2025-01-30
WALL PETER R.
Officer
$325,648
@ $83.01 · 2025-01-23
MIHALIK TREVOR I
Officer
$2.21M
@ $93.09 · 2024-11-20
WALL PETER R.
Officer
$457,927
@ $75.07 · 2024-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SRE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
SRE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View INTU Full AnalysisView SRE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SRE

Is Intuit Inc. or Sempra more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $267), compared to SRE's -1069.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $91).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Sempra?

INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while SRE scores 29/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Sempra in financial distress?

SRE's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Sempra?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Sempra's -47.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Sempra?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus SRE's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Sempra's?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SRE's 43/100 (Borderline). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.