Compare Stocks › INTU vs SPG

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTU is undervalued at $341, with a DCF intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. SPG is fairly valued at $218, with an intrinsic value of $238 and a margin of safety of 9%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09
VS
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
$217.75

Rewards

INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SPG
  • ★Gross margin of 81.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Simon Property Group, Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

INTU
    SPG
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.58 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (4.86x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    SPG
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.60B
    9.45%
    FCF Yield
    3.14%
    20.72
    Trailing P/E
    15.37
    12.66
    Forward P/E
    32.15
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    7.15%
    23.60%
    ROE
    120.51%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    81.43%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    4.58
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    4.86
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.54
    1.62%
    Dividend Yield
    4.09%
    INTU: 7Ties: 2SPG: 3
    INTUSPG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    SPG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-10.70
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-83.73B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SPG
    $106.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $205.6M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$21.79B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    39.9% Margin of Safety
    Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $341.09
    Fair Value: $567.66
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SPG
    8.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 8.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $217.75
    Fair Value: $238.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

    +6.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -0.9%

    The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    SPG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $218?

    +8.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.1%

    The market implies +8.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +18.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SPG
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SPG
    -2.24
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,538
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SPG
    Insiders 1.8%Institutions 96.0%Retail & Other 2.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,865
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SPG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    22
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $696,520
    JONES NINA P.
    Director
    $447.00
    @ $223.50 · 2026-06-30
    CICCO MARTIN J
    Director
    $447.00
    @ $223.50 · 2026-06-30
    AEPPEL GLYN F
    Director
    $9,871
    @ $224.34 · 2026-06-30
    STEWART MARTA R.
    Director
    $672.00
    @ $224.00 · 2026-06-30
    SELIG STEFAN M
    Director
    $7,392
    @ $224.00 · 2026-06-30
    ROE PEGGY FANG
    Director
    $2,010
    @ $223.33 · 2026-06-30
    RODKIN GARY M
    Director
    $10,538
    @ $224.21 · 2026-06-30
    SMITH DANIEL C.
    Director
    $13,004
    @ $224.21 · 2026-06-30
    LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
    Director
    $17,525
    @ $224.68 · 2026-06-30
    GLASSCOCK LARRY C
    Director
    $15,046
    @ $224.57 · 2026-06-30
    JONES NINA P.
    Director
    $6,617
    @ $183.81 · 2026-03-31
    AEPPEL GLYN F
    Director
    $40,620
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    STEWART MARTA R.
    Director
    $36,025
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    SELIG STEFAN M
    Director
    $37,863
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    ROE PEGGY FANG
    Director
    $14,888
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    RODKIN GARY M
    Director
    $42,642
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    LEWIS RANDALL J.
    Director
    $10,293
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    SMITH DANIEL C.
    Director
    $65,249
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
    Director
    $90,246
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    GLASSCOCK LARRY C
    Director
    $68,557
    @ $183.80 · 2026-03-31
    LEWIS RANDALL J.
    Director
    $100,258
    @ $183.96 · 2025-12-15
    LEWIS RANDALL J.
    Director
    $106,310
    @ $180.80 · 2025-11-18
    AEPPEL GLYN F
    Director
    $38,678
    @ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
    SELIG STEFAN M
    Director
    $36,260
    @ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
    ROE PEGGY FANG
    Director
    $14,132
    @ $185.95 · 2025-09-30
    STEWART MARTA R.
    Director
    $7,205
    @ $171.55 · 2025-08-14
    JONES NINA P.
    Director
    $6,053
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    AEPPEL GLYN F
    Director
    $37,274
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    STEWART MARTA R.
    Director
    $33,132
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    ROE PEGGY FANG
    Director
    $13,699
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    RODKIN GARY M
    Director
    $39,185
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    SMITH DANIEL C.
    Director
    $60,212
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
    Director
    $83,149
    @ $159.29 · 2025-06-30
    LEIBOWITZ REUBEN S
    Director
    $79,434
    @ $164.80 · 2025-03-31
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    2
    Sells (3M)
    10
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.54M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SPG
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.01M
    RULLI JOHN
    Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $200.88 · 2026-02-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(41/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SPG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
    SPG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView SPG Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SPG

    Is Intuit Inc. or Simon Property Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to SPG's 8.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $238 vs. $218).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Simon Property Group, Inc.?▼

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while SPG scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Simon Property Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    SPG's Altman Z-Score of 1.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Simon Property Group, Inc.?▼

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 9.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Simon Property Group, Inc.'s 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Simon Property Group, Inc.?▼

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus SPG's 7.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Simon Property Group, Inc.'s?▼

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SPG's 54/100 (Borderline). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    INTU vs SPG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io