Compare StocksINTU vs SO

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs The Southern Company (SO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $315, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. SO is overvalued at $87, with an intrinsic value of $15 and a margin of safety of -493%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$315.45
VS
SO
The Southern Company
$86.52

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
SO
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.41 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

INTU
    SO
    • The Southern Company scores only 26/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • PEG ratio of 2.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (1.75x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    SO
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-3.91B
    10.22%
    FCF Yield
    -3.93%
    19.18
    Trailing P/E
    20.85
    11.54
    Forward P/E
    17.57
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    5.91%
    23.60%
    ROE
    11.48%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    48.29%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    2.06
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.75
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.20
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    3.53%
    INTU: 10Ties: 1SO: 1
    INTUSO

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    SO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-11.58
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-90.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SO
    $5.15
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.71B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$19.12B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    44.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $315.45
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SO
    492.5% Overvalued
    Price is 492.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $86.52
    Fair Value: $14.60
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $315?

    +5.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.0%

    The market implies +5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    SO

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SO
    26/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SO
    -2.65
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SO
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 74.2%Retail & Other 25.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,863
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SO
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SO
    6
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.21M
    SENA PETER P III
    Officer
    $377,925
    @ $88.59 · 2026-09-03
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $124,418
    @ $88.87 · 2026-09-03
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $8,845
    @ $88.45 · 2026-09-01
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $313,369
    @ $94.02 · 2026-08-06
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $9,428
    @ $94.28 · 2026-08-03
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $9,577
    @ $95.77 · 2026-07-01
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $9,116
    @ $91.16 · 2026-06-01
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $9,657
    @ $96.57 · 2026-05-01
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Officer
    $2.42M
    @ $96.67 · 2026-03-30
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $643,892
    @ $96.55 · 2026-03-19
    CONNALLY STANLEY W JR
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $97.13 · 2026-03-18
    KIM MATTHEW M.
    Officer
    $487,453
    @ $95.15 · 2026-02-24
    ANDERSON BRYAN D
    Officer
    $582,309
    @ $93.83 · 2025-09-30
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $226,148
    @ $95.02 · 2025-08-11
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $95.00 · 2025-07-21
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $89.54 · 2025-05-23
    CONNALLY STANLEY W JR
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $92.24 · 2025-03-31
    GREENE KIMBERLY S
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $93.12 · 2025-03-10
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $90.13 · 2025-03-03
    DAVIS MARTIN BERNARD
    Chief Technology Officer
    $100,811
    @ $89.61 · 2025-03-03
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $143,370
    @ $90.00 · 2025-02-25
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $81,184
    @ $86.00 · 2025-02-19
    PEOPLES JAMES JEFFREY
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $86.00 · 2025-02-11
    CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $69,739
    @ $83.32 · 2025-02-04
    WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $86.18 · 2024-12-05
    DAVIS MARTIN BERNARD
    Chief Technology Officer
    $100,503
    @ $85.90 · 2024-12-05
    SPAINHOUR STERLING A. JR.
    Officer
    $70,212
    @ $88.54 · 2024-11-04
    KERR JAMES Y. II
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.69M
    @ $89.64 · 2024-10-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SO
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    SO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView SO Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SO

    Is Intuit Inc. or The Southern Company more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 44.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $315), compared to SO's -492.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $15 vs. $87).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or The Southern Company?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while SO scores 26/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Southern Company in financial distress?

    SO's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or The Southern Company?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.2% free cash flow yield, compared to The Southern Company's -3.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or The Southern Company?

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus SO's 5.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or The Southern Company's?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to SO's 63/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.