Compare StocksINTU vs SNA

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Snap-On Incorporated (SNA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, INTU is undervalued at $316, with a DCF intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 41%. SNA is fairly valued at $410, with an intrinsic value of $436 and a margin of safety of 6%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.07
VS
SNA
Snap-On Incorporated
$410.41

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
SNA
  • Snap-On Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Snap-On Incorporated scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

INTU
  • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
SNA
  • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.9x is 32% above the historical average of 15.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.28 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
SNA
Valuation
$5.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.11B
6.05%
FCF Yield
5.23%
19.27
Trailing P/E
20.92
11.56
Forward P/E
19.23
Quality & Moat
28.21%
ROIC
14.35%
22.50%
ROE
17.93%
80.79%
Gross Margin
51.83%
0.82
PEG Ratio
2.28
Balance Sheet Safety
0.01
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.24
1.52%
Dividend Yield
2.38%
INTU: 8Ties: 1SNA: 3
INTUSNA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SNA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SNA
$3.12
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
41.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $316.07
Fair Value: $536.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SNA
5.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 5.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $410.41
Fair Value: $436.03
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $316?

+7.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.1%

The market implies +7.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

SNA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $410?

+7.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.9%

The market implies +7.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SNA
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SNA
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 6.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,638
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SNA
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 100.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,424
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SNA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
3
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.62M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$74,499
@ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SNA
7
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $56.23M
CHAMBERS TIMOTHY L.
Officer
$3.82M
@ $419.36 · 2026-07-28
CHAMBERS TIMOTHY L.
Officer
$163,157
@ $419.43 · 2026-07-17
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$811,840
@ $405.92 · 2026-07-01
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$166,338
@ $389.55 · 2026-06-10
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
Officer
$1.63M
@ $383.92 · 2026-06-10
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$504,430
@ $379.27 · 2026-06-04
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $367.19 · 2026-05-14
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$8.79M
@ $375.77 · 2026-05-05
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Investment Officer
$534,075
@ $387.57 · 2026-02-25
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$8.91M
@ $383.36 · 2026-02-23
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.69M
@ $382.05 · 2026-02-19
CHAMBERS TIMOTHY L.
Officer
$3.08M
@ $385.13 · 2026-02-04
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.39M
@ $352.20 · 2025-12-11
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.07M
@ $346.80 · 2025-12-04
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$1.29M
@ $346.62 · 2025-12-04
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.67M
@ $339.15 · 2025-12-02
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
Officer
$1.29M
@ $337.28 · 2025-11-25
JONES NATHAN J
Director
$340,615
@ $340.62 · 2025-11-13
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.59M
@ $327.33 · 2025-08-15
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.39M
@ $320.88 · 2025-08-11
DANIEL KAREN L
Director
$348,716
@ $319.92 · 2025-06-05
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.32M
@ $315.85 · 2025-06-02
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.81M
@ $326.84 · 2025-05-15
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.61M
@ $335.32 · 2025-03-27
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.33M
@ $339.05 · 2025-02-20
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
President
$2.18M
@ $337.81 · 2025-02-10
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $347.62 · 2024-12-18
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.73M
@ $354.83 · 2024-12-09
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Technology Officer
$1.27M
@ $362.86 · 2024-12-04
WARD THOMAS J
Officer
$4.24M
@ $333.21 · 2024-10-28
BOYD IAIN
Officer
$1.34M
@ $318.46 · 2024-10-18
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$1.06M
@ $324.78 · 2024-10-18
BOYD IAIN
Officer
$1.81M
@ $298.99 · 2024-10-15
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$986,885
@ $299.42 · 2024-10-15
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Technology Officer
$336,786
@ $283.97 · 2024-08-26
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$480,429
@ $282.61 · 2024-08-23
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $278.74 · 2024-08-22
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$6.49M
@ $268.95 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SNA
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
SNA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View INTU Full AnalysisView SNA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs SNA

Is Intuit Inc. or Snap-On Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 41.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $316), compared to SNA's 5.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $436 vs. $410).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Snap-On Incorporated?

SNA scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Snap-On Incorporated?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 6.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Snap-On Incorporated's 5.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Snap-On Incorporated?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus SNA's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Snap-On Incorporated's?

SNA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). SNA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.