Compare StocksINTU vs ROP

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $321, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 43%. ROP is fairly valued at $376, with an intrinsic value of $445 and a margin of safety of 16%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$320.98
VS
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$375.56

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROP
  • Gross margin of 69.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 54.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.6x is 47% below the historical average of 29.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

INTU
    ROP
    • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Insiders have sold $3.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    ROP
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.27B
    10.05%
    FCF Yield
    6.10%
    19.51
    Trailing P/E
    15.64
    11.74
    Forward P/E
    15.46
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    6.04%
    23.60%
    ROE
    13.07%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    69.53%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    1.55
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.59
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.38
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    0.97%
    INTU: 10Ties: 1ROP: 1
    INTUROP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    ROP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-11.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ROP
    $0.46
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $3.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    43.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $320.98
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ROP
    15.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 15.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $375.56
    Fair Value: $444.69
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $321?

    +5.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.7%

    The market implies +5.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    ROP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $376?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.5%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ROP
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ROP
    -2.54
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ROP
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 106.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ROP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.57M
    JOYCE THOMAS PATRICK JR
    Director
    $501,844
    @ $358.46 · 2026-02-06
    BRINKLEY AMY WOODS
    Director
    $540,856
    @ $450.71 · 2025-11-12
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.52M
    @ $452.23 · 2025-11-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ROP
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $19.06M
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    Officer
    $758,100
    @ $379.05 · 2026-07-27
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $2.32M
    @ $361.00 · 2026-07-24
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $445.56 · 2025-12-01
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.31M
    @ $443.57 · 2025-11-11
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $210,158
    @ $525.39 · 2025-08-15
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $846,255
    @ $564.17 · 2025-07-23
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $195,800
    @ $556.25 · 2025-07-22
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $200,277
    @ $572.22 · 2025-05-05
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $588.19 · 2025-02-25
    CROSS BRANDON L
    Officer
    $433,372
    @ $577.83 · 2025-02-04
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $578,040
    @ $578.04 · 2025-01-31
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $578.05 · 2025-01-31
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $201,913
    @ $575.25 · 2025-01-31
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $528,092
    @ $561.80 · 2024-12-03
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.17M
    @ $572.47 · 2024-11-08
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $387,366
    @ $568.82 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ROP
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(34/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    ROP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView ROP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs ROP

    Is Intuit Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $321), compared to ROP's 15.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $445 vs. $376).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while ROP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Roper Technologies, Inc.'s 6.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus ROP's 6.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Roper Technologies, Inc.'s?

    ROP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). ROP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.