Compare StocksINTU vs MTB

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $317, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. MTB is undervalued at $225, with an intrinsic value of $507 and a margin of safety of 56%. Of the two, MTB has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.57
VS
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
$225.38

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
MTB
  • M&T Bank Corporation scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.15 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

INTU
    MTB
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.28 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $6.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    MTB
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    10.19%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    19.24
    Trailing P/E
    11.93
    11.58
    Forward P/E
    10.69
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    18.02%
    23.60%
    ROE
    10.74%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    1.45
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    2.65%
    INTU: 3Ties: 1MTB: 4
    INTUMTB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MTB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-11.54
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-90.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MTB
    $1.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    44.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $316.57
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MTB
    55.6% Margin of Safety
    Price is 55.6% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $225.38
    Fair Value: $507.39
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $317?

    +5.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.9%

    The market implies +5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    MTB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MTB
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MTB
    -2.42
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MTB
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 92.4%Retail & Other 7.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,508
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MTB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MTB
    6
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $21.30M
    JONES RENE F.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.64M
    @ $239.35 · 2026-09-14
    SESERI RUDINA
    Director
    $150,171
    @ $241.04 · 2026-08-21
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $308,923
    @ $253.84 · 2026-08-17
    LEDGETT RICHARD H. JR.
    Director
    $212,178
    @ $248.16 · 2026-08-03
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $484,000
    @ $242.00 · 2026-07-15
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $213,202
    @ $242.00 · 2026-07-01
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $256,087
    @ $233.23 · 2026-06-15
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $5.27M
    @ $225.50 · 2026-06-09
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $440,000
    @ $220.00 · 2026-06-04
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $672,232
    @ $216.50 · 2026-05-07
    WISLER MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $1.84M
    @ $223.51 · 2026-02-26
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $246,623
    @ $234.21 · 2026-02-11
    BARNES JOHN P
    Director
    $5.00M
    @ $235.85 · 2026-02-09
    WALTERS KIRK W
    Director
    $206,676
    @ $227.37 · 2026-02-03
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $158,638
    @ $225.34 · 2026-02-02
    GEISEL GARY N
    Director
    $191,369
    @ $215.99 · 2026-01-28
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $191.70 · 2025-11-26
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $693,061
    @ $202.12 · 2025-08-29
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $89,502
    @ $199.78 · 2025-08-26
    D'ARCY PETER
    Officer
    $485,570
    @ $197.31 · 2025-07-22
    LEDGETT RICHARD H. JR.
    Director
    $252,178
    @ $197.48 · 2025-07-21
    KAY CHRISTOPHER E
    Officer
    $299,527
    @ $172.34 · 2025-03-12
    WOODROW TRACY S
    Officer
    $468,200
    @ $220.74 · 2024-11-26
    SALAMONE DENIS J
    Director
    $2.23M
    @ $223.41 · 2024-11-25
    WISLER MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $213.05 · 2024-11-14
    TODARO MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $214.10 · 2024-11-12
    PEARSON KEVIN J
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $195.88 · 2024-11-01
    JONES RENE F.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.47M
    @ $193.88 · 2024-10-28
    O HARA LAURA PROSKE
    Officer
    $956,118
    @ $196.93 · 2024-10-28
    TAYLOR JOHN R
    Officer
    $280,057
    @ $195.03 · 2024-10-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MTB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    MTB
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView MTB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs MTB

    Is Intuit Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MTB trades at a 55.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $507 vs. price $225), compared to INTU's 44.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $565 vs. $317).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while MTB scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is M&T Bank Corporation in financial distress?

    MTB's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or M&T Bank Corporation?

    MTB earns 18.0% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or M&T Bank Corporation's?

    MTB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). MTB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.