Compare StocksINTU vs MRK

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $318, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. MRK is undervalued at $145, with an intrinsic value of $596 and a margin of safety of 76%. Of the two, MRK has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$318.13
VS
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
$144.91

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
MRK
  • Gross margin of 75.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.94 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

INTU
    MRK
    • PEG ratio of 2.65 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • 7 insider sales totaling $30.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 5.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    INTU
    MRK
    Valuation
    $8.62B
    Free Cash Flow
    $15.17B
    10.14%
    FCF Yield
    4.24%
    19.34
    Trailing P/E
    115.93
    11.63
    Forward P/E
    15.17
    Quality & Moat
    10.90%
    ROIC
    -0.13%
    23.60%
    ROE
    6.96%
    80.98%
    Gross Margin
    75.90%
    1.08
    PEG Ratio
    2.65
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.06
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.11
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.18
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.62
    1.74%
    Dividend Yield
    2.35%
    INTU: 9Ties: 1MRK: 2
    INTUMRK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MRK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    INTU
    $-11.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MRK
    $-1.72
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $12.28B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-21.09B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    INTU
    43.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $318.13
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MRK
    75.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 75.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $144.91
    Fair Value: $596.15
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $318?

    +5.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.9%

    The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    MRK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $145?

    +7.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +11.6%

    The market implies +7.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MRK
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MRK
    -2.31
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MRK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.1%Retail & Other 16.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,839
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MRK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    THULIN INGE G
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $88.28 · 2025-02-06
    BAKER DOUGLAS M JR
    Director
    $1.33M
    @ $88.50 · 2025-02-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MRK
    7
    Sells (3M)
    21
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $72.01M
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $135.00 · 2026-08-13
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $5.94M
    @ $131.12 · 2026-08-12
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $10.72M
    @ $133.46 · 2026-08-12
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $131.00 · 2026-08-06
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $788,773
    @ $130.38 · 2026-08-06
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $6.81M
    @ $128.77 · 2026-08-05
    MARALDO DAVID R.
    Officer
    $2.41M
    @ $128.72 · 2026-08-05
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $121.46 · 2026-02-12
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $117.52 · 2026-02-10
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $118.41 · 2026-02-09
    ZACHARY JENNIFER L
    General Counsel
    $14.49M
    @ $119.15 · 2026-02-09
    DELUCA RICHARD ROBERT JR.
    Officer
    $4.56M
    @ $120.92 · 2026-02-06
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $609,525
    @ $121.91 · 2026-02-06
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $121.87 · 2026-02-06
    GUINDO CHIRFI
    Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $121.88 · 2026-02-05
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $765,920
    @ $119.67 · 2026-02-04
    LI DEAN Y
    Officer
    $1.79M
    @ $118.77 · 2026-02-04
    LITCHFIELD CAROLINE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.02M
    @ $119.61 · 2026-02-04
    DAVIS ROBERT M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.60M
    @ $118.04 · 2026-02-04
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $616,395
    @ $87.00 · 2025-11-10
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $720,040
    @ $83.59 · 2025-11-03
    SMART DALTON E. III
    Officer
    $352,723
    @ $82.76 · 2025-04-25
    OOSTHUIZEN JOHANNES JACOBUS
    Officer
    $714,745
    @ $84.09 · 2025-02-19
    WILLIAMS DAVID MICHAEL
    Chief Technology Officer
    $512,057
    @ $85.34 · 2025-02-13
    DOWNING CRISTAL N.
    Officer
    $209,551
    @ $88.76 · 2025-02-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(31/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MRK
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
    MRK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View INTU Full AnalysisView MRK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs MRK

    Is Intuit Inc. or Merck & Co., Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MRK trades at a 75.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $596 vs. price $145), compared to INTU's 43.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $565 vs. $318).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while MRK scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Merck & Co., Inc.'s 4.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Merck & Co., Inc.?

    INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus MRK's -0.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Merck & Co., Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MRK's 79/100 (Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    INTU vs MRK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io