Compare StocksINTU vs MDT

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, INTU is undervalued at $317, with a DCF intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 44%. MDT is overvalued at $92, with an intrinsic value of $80 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.57
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$92.33

Rewards

INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
MDT
  • Gross margin of 65.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.25 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
MDT
Valuation
$8.62B
Free Cash Flow
$5.41B
10.19%
FCF Yield
4.58%
19.24
Trailing P/E
22.74
11.58
Forward P/E
14.41
Quality & Moat
10.90%
ROIC
7.26%
23.60%
ROE
10.65%
80.98%
Gross Margin
65.27%
1.08
PEG Ratio
1.69
Balance Sheet Safety
0.06
Net Debt / Equity
0.38
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.86
1.74%
Dividend Yield
3.11%
INTU: 10Ties: 1MDT: 1
INTUMDT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MDT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$-11.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.83B
Δ Market Cap
$-90.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MDT
$3.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.25B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
44.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $316.57
Fair Value: $565.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MDT
14.9% Overvalued
Price is 14.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $92.33
Fair Value: $80.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $317?

+5.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -1.9%

The market implies +5.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MDT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $92?

+9.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.0%

The market implies +9.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MDT
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.98
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MDT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,541
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MDT
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 88.7%Retail & Other 10.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,918
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MDT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JELLISON WILLIAM R
Director
$462,750
@ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
3
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.34M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$92,728
@ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$314,288
@ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$74,499
@ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MDT
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.79M
WALTER MATTHEW R.
Officer
$257,931
@ $83.15 · 2026-07-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$336,965
@ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$5.13M
@ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
SMITH GREGORY L
Officer
$3.06M
@ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$788,048
@ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$1.12M
@ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$792,038
@ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MDT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
MDT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View INTU Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs MDT

Is Intuit Inc. or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 44.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $317), compared to MDT's -14.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $80 vs. $92).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Medtronic plc?

INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Medtronic plc in financial distress?

MDT's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 4.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Medtronic plc?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Medtronic plc's 4.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Medtronic plc?

INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus MDT's 7.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or Medtronic plc's?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDT's 49/100 (Borderline). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.