Compare StocksINTU vs MCK

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs McKesson Corporation (MCK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, INTU is undervalued at $267, with a DCF intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 50%. MCK is undervalued at $751, with an intrinsic value of $1197 and a margin of safety of 37%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00
VS
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$750.63

Rewards

INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MCK
  • McKesson Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • McKesson Corporation scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
MCK
  • Gross margin of 3.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $10.3M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
INTU
MCK
Valuation
$5.23B
Free Cash Flow
$5.66B
7.16%
FCF Yield
6.44%
16.30
Trailing P/E
19.54
9.77
Forward P/E
14.91
Quality & Moat
28.21%
ROIC
80.13%
22.50%
ROE
N/A
80.79%
Gross Margin
3.60%
0.73
PEG Ratio
1.53
Balance Sheet Safety
0.01
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.70
1.71%
Dividend Yield
0.42%
INTU: 7Ties: 1MCK: 2
INTUMCK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MCK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MCK
$2.71
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$10.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$27.11B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
INTU
50.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $535.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MCK
37.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 37.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $750.63
Fair Value: $1197.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MCK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $751?

+7.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.0%

The market implies +7.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +5.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MCK
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MCK
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,820
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MCK
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 96.0%Retail & Other 3.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,710
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MCK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.47M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MCK
6
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $45.07M
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$3.76M
@ $763.00 · 2026-06-09
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$101,612
@ $764.00 · 2026-06-05
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$604,420
@ $735.30 · 2026-06-02
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$1.33M
@ $735.50 · 2026-06-01
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$1.82M
@ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$2.70M
@ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$2.70M
@ $990.00 · 2026-03-02
MARTINEZ MARIA N.
Director
$328,013
@ $939.87 · 2026-02-19
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$179,550
@ $945.00 · 2026-02-17
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$282,817
@ $933.39 · 2026-02-11
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$313,240
@ $955.00 · 2026-02-06
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$225,266
@ $816.18 · 2026-01-05
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$283,476
@ $861.63 · 2025-11-07
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$8.42M
@ $705.63 · 2025-08-22
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$8.09M
@ $677.76 · 2025-08-15
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$218,347
@ $663.67 · 2025-08-08
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$13.72M
@ $708.09 · 2025-07-11
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$13.67M
@ $705.93 · 2025-06-06
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$2.06M
@ $712.18 · 2025-05-30
RODGERS THOMAS L
Officer
$366,134
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$68,201
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$244,807
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.35M
@ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$749,360
@ $714.36 · 2025-05-27
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$115,154
@ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$523,556
@ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$895,190
@ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
VITALONE BRITT J
Chief Financial Officer
$4.54M
@ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
Officer
$394,495
@ $726.51 · 2025-05-19
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.68M
@ $634.24 · 2025-03-06
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.59M
@ $624.00 · 2025-02-28
LAU MICHELE
Officer
$188,760
@ $605.00 · 2025-02-25
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $597.99 · 2025-02-21
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$5.38M
@ $600.66 · 2025-02-14
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$114,603
@ $609.59 · 2025-02-12
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$331,645
@ $572.79 · 2025-01-02
SMITH LEANN B
Officer
$349,027
@ $602.81 · 2024-12-09
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.11M
@ $561.10 · 2024-09-05
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.35M
@ $626.03 · 2024-08-05
TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$2.18M
@ $580.92 · 2024-07-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MCK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
MCK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View INTU Full AnalysisView MCK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs MCK

Is Intuit Inc. or McKesson Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $267), compared to MCK's 37.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $1197 vs. $751).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or McKesson Corporation?

MCK scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or McKesson Corporation?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to McKesson Corporation's 6.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or McKesson Corporation?

MCK earns 80.1% ROIC versus INTU's 28.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Intuit Inc.'s or McKesson Corporation's?

MCK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to INTU's 94/100 (Very Safe). MCK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.