Compare Stocks › INTU vs LYV

Intuit Inc. (INTU) vs Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, INTU is undervalued at $341, with a DCF intrinsic value of $568 and a margin of safety of 40%. LYV is overvalued at $178, with an intrinsic value of $152 and a margin of safety of -17%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

INTU
Intuit Inc.
$341.09
VS
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
$177.89

Rewards

INTU
  • ★Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
LYV

    Risks

    INTU
      LYV
      • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.64 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
      • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 41.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      INTU
      LYV
      Valuation
      $8.62B
      Free Cash Flow
      $1.70B
      9.45%
      FCF Yield
      4.09%
      20.72
      Trailing P/E
      N/A
      12.66
      Forward P/E
      93.54
      Quality & Moat
      10.90%
      ROIC
      10.61%
      23.60%
      ROE
      17.68%
      80.98%
      Gross Margin
      25.78%
      1.08
      PEG Ratio
      4.64
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.06
      Net Debt / Equity
      1.22
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.18
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      1.43
      1.62%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      INTU: 9Ties: 2LYV: 0
      INTULYV

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      INTU

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      LYV

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      INTU
      $-10.70
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $7.83B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-83.73B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      LYV
      $8.94
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $1.95B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$17.42B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      INTU
      39.9% Margin of Safety
      Price is 39.9% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $341.09
      Fair Value: $567.66
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      LYV
      16.9% Overvalued
      Price is 16.9% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $177.89
      Fair Value: $152.22
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      INTU

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $341?

      +6.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies -0.9%

      The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      LYV

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $178?

      +28.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +11.2%

      The market implies +28.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      INTU
      94/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      LYV
      51/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      INTU
      -2.98
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      LYV
      -2.58
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      INTU
      Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.3%
      No. of Institutional Holders2,538
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      LYV
      Insiders 32.4%Institutions 85.7%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,194
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      INTU
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $541,665
      PRABHU VASANT M.
      Director
      $541,665
      @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      LYV
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      INTU
      2
      Sells (3M)
      10
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $3.54M
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $92,728
      @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $314,288
      @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $74,499
      @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $80,145
      @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $289,448
      @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $457,046
      @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $840,097
      @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $741,172
      @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $219,763
      @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $435,354
      @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $792,160
      @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $665,951
      @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $27,930
      @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $255,887
      @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
      DALZELL RICHARD L
      Director
      $521,891
      @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $689,400
      @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.03M
      @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $1.25M
      @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $887,583
      @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
      HOTZ LAUREN DALE
      Officer
      $1.36M
      @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
      BALAZS ALEX G
      Chief Technology Officer
      $1.12M
      @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $26.12M
      @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $19.29M
      @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $30.46M
      @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
      MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
      General Counsel
      $12.18M
      @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
      AUJLA SANDEEP S
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.66M
      @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
      NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
      Officer
      $340,143
      @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
      FENNELL LAURA A
      Officer
      $5.00M
      @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
      TESSEL MARIANNA
      Officer
      $4.43M
      @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
      BURTON EVE B
      Director
      $1.02M
      @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      LYV
      1
      Sells (3M)
      5
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $26.99M
      CAPO BRIAN
      Officer
      $533,600
      @ $184.00 · 2026-08-24
      HINSON JEFFREY T
      Director
      $370,125
      @ $175.00 · 2026-06-15
      ROWLES MICHAEL G
      General Counsel
      $10.47M
      @ $164.24 · 2026-05-08
      HOPMANS JOHN
      Officer
      $15.46M
      @ $166.07 · 2026-05-07
      HINSON JEFFREY T
      Director
      $156,581
      @ $165.87 · 2026-03-10
      HOPMANS JOHN
      Officer
      $5.13M
      @ $147.38 · 2025-05-16
      HINSON JEFFREY T
      Director
      $539,520
      @ $135.66 · 2025-05-09
      HINSON JEFFREY T
      Director
      $61,475
      @ $122.95 · 2025-03-12
      CAPO BRIAN
      Officer
      $624,334
      @ $123.24 · 2025-03-11
      ROWLES MICHAEL G
      General Counsel
      $14.06M
      @ $152.83 · 2025-02-25
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      INTU
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      LYV
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(59/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      INTU
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      LYV
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
      View INTU Full AnalysisView LYV Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: INTU vs LYV

      Is Intuit Inc. or Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 39.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $568 vs. price $341), compared to LYV's -16.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $152 vs. $178).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Intuit Inc. or Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.?▼

      INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while LYV scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. in financial distress?▼

      LYV's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Intuit Inc. or Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.?▼

      Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 9.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Intuit Inc. or Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.?▼

      INTU earns 10.9% ROIC versus LYV's 10.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      INTU vs LYV: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io